Which place is cheaper, Cuenca or Utrecht?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
Should I visit Utrecht or Cuenca? This is a common question asked by many travelers. By figuring out which city has activities that align with your interests along with knowing which is more affordable, you'll understand where you can get more bang for your buck. So, let's dive into the details and the data, which all comes from actual travelers.
Utrecht is both a province and a city in the Netherlands. The city is a unique university city with a lively atmosphere. Imagine Amsterdam but smaller, and with fewer tourists. Utrecht has the same underlying historical/magical feel as Amsterdam, but is full of locals rather than crowds of tourists. It has a population of about 300,000 making it the fourth largest city in the Netherlands.
Cuenca is a vibrant colonial city in southern Ecuador, the third largest in the country, and the capital of Azuay Province. Cuenca is considered as Ecuador's most important and beautiful colonial city after Quito. Dating from the 16th century, Cuenca's historic center, a Unesco World Heritage Site with its trademark skyline of massive rotundas and soaring steeples, is a magical sight in which you will feel like you are moving back in time. Cuenca is the center of many craft traditions, including ceramics, metalwork and the internationally famous panama hat. The nearby villages also offer many other handicrafts. Tourists enjoy wandering the ancient streets discovering picturesque alleys and hidden corners, where nuns march along cobblestone streets and kids in Catholic-school uniforms skip past historic churches. Fascinating historic monuments and fabulous views are found at every turn. Cuenca also has outstanding art museums and festivals. For a rewarding cultural experience, visit during Easter to attend the Festival of Religious Music.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Family-Friendly Tours to Netherlands, The Best One Week (7-Day) Tours in Netherlands, The Best Wildlife Tours to Ecuador, and The Best Hiking & Trekking Tours in Ecuador.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
The average daily cost (per person) in Utrecht is $271, while the average daily cost in Cuenca is $53. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Utrecht and Cuenca in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Utrecht or Cuenca? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Utrecht:
Below are a few samples from actual travelers for transportation costs in Cuenca:
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Cuenca:
Prices for flights to both Cuenca and Utrecht change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Utrecht.
Below are a few samples from actual travelers for food and meal costs in Cuenca:
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Cuenca.
Some specific costs of activities, tours, and entrance tickets for Utrecht are as follows:
Here are a few actual costs in Cuenca for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Utrecht and Cuenca, we can see that Utrecht is more expensive. And not only is Cuenca much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Utrecht is in Europe and Cuenca is in South America, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Cuenca would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Cuenca and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Utrecht would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Utrecht than you might in Cuenca.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Utrecht Expensive? and Is Cuenca Expensive?.
Utrecht has a larger population, and is about 5% larger than the population of Cuenca. When comparing the sizes of Utrecht and Cuenca, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Utrecht has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Cuenca experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
The summer attracts plenty of travelers to both Utrecht and Cuenca. Most visitors come to Utrecht for the family-friendly experiences during these months. Cuenca attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate.
In the summer, Utrecht is cooler than Cuenca. Typically, the summer temperatures in Utrecht in July average around 17°C (62°F), and Cuenca averages at about 22°C (72°F).
In July, Utrecht usually receives more rain than Cuenca. Utrecht gets 75 mm (3 in) of rain, while Cuenca receives 17 mm (0.7 in) of rain each month for the summer.
The autumn brings many poeple to Utrecht as well as Cuenca. The autumn months attract visitors to Utrecht because of the shopping scene and the natural beauty of the area. The warm climate attracts visitors to Cuenca throughout the year.
In October, Utrecht is generally cooler than Cuenca. Daily temperatures in Utrecht average around 11°C (51°F), and Cuenca fluctuates around 12°C (54°F).
Utrecht usually gets more rain in October than Cuenca. Utrecht gets 72 mm (2.8 in) of rain, while Cuenca receives 42 mm (1.7 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Cuenca and Utrecht are popular destinations to visit in the winter with plenty of activities. The museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine are the main draw to Utrecht this time of year. Plenty of visitors come to Cuenca because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year.
Be prepared for some very cold days in Cuenca. It's quite cold in Utrecht in the winter. Utrecht is much colder than Cuenca in the winter. The daily temperature in Utrecht averages around 2°C (36°F) in January, and Cuenca fluctuates around 4°C (39°F).
In January, Utrecht usually receives more rain than Cuenca. Utrecht gets 66 mm (2.6 in) of rain, while Cuenca receives 14 mm (0.6 in) of rain each month for the winter.
Both Cuenca and Utrecht during the spring are popular places to visit. Many travelers come to Utrecht for the natural beauty. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Cuenca year-round.
In the spring, Utrecht is cooler than Cuenca. Typically, the spring temperatures in Utrecht in April average around 8°C (46°F), and Cuenca averages at about 10°C (50°F).
Utrecht usually gets more rain in April than Cuenca. Utrecht gets 52 mm (2 in) of rain, while Cuenca receives 35 mm (1.4 in) of rain this time of the year.
Utrecht | Cuenca | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 2°C (36°F) | 66 mm (2.6 in) | 4°C (39°F) | 14 mm (0.6 in) |
Feb | 3°C (37°F) | 49 mm (1.9 in) | 6°C (43°F) | 22 mm (0.9 in) |
Mar | 5°C (41°F) | 63 mm (2.5 in) | 8°C (46°F) | 15 mm (0.6 in) |
Apr | 8°C (46°F) | 52 mm (2 in) | 10°C (50°F) | 35 mm (1.4 in) |
May | 12°C (54°F) | 61 mm (2.4 in) | 14°C (57°F) | 41 mm (1.6 in) |
Jun | 15°C (59°F) | 68 mm (2.7 in) | 19°C (66°F) | 35 mm (1.4 in) |
Jul | 17°C (62°F) | 75 mm (3 in) | 22°C (72°F) | 17 mm (0.7 in) |
Aug | 17°C (62°F) | 71 mm (2.8 in) | 22°C (72°F) | 23 mm (0.9 in) |
Sep | 14°C (57°F) | 67 mm (2.6 in) | 17°C (63°F) | 20 mm (0.8 in) |
Oct | 11°C (51°F) | 72 mm (2.8 in) | 12°C (54°F) | 42 mm (1.7 in) |
Nov | 6°C (43°F) | 81 mm (3.2 in) | 7°C (45°F) | 33 mm (1.3 in) |
Dec | 3°C (38°F) | 80 mm (3.1 in) | 5°C (41°F) | 15 mm (0.6 in) |