Which place is cheaper, Chicago or Manila?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
Which city is more affordable and which is best for your travel style? If you're trying to figure out where to go next, comparing the travel costs between Manila and Chicago can help you decide which place is right for you.
A sprawling metropolis that is home to more than 12 million people, Manila is one huge, misunderstood concrete jungle, full of diverse cultures, traffic, pollution, restaurants, shopping malls, noise and nightlife. If you're looking to soak in culture and feel the vibe of a place rather than seeking a city that specifically caters to tourists, Manila is the place to be. Capital of the Philippines, Manila is also the center for education, business, and transportation.
Located in the Midwest, Chicago is the third largest city in the United States. It has a population of almost 3 million and a metropolitan area that covers more than 10,000 square kilometers. It is also a hub for music, comedy and theater. It's skyline is beautiful with modern skyscrapers and Lake Michigan as a backdrop. It is easy to stay entertained in Chicago for weeks. There are world class museums, upscale or eclectic shopping opportunities, and impressive architecture.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Eco Tours in Philippines, The Best Romantic Tours for Couples in Philippines, The Best Family-Friendly Tours to United States of America, and The Best Wildlife Tours to United States of America.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Manila is $93, while the average daily cost in Chicago is $288. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Manila and Chicago in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Manila or Chicago? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Manila:
Here are some examples of typical transportation prices from actual travelers in Chicago:
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Chicago:
Prices for flights to both Chicago and Manila change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Manila.
Below are a few samples from actual travelers for food and meal costs in Chicago:
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Chicago.
Some specific costs of activities, tours, and entrance tickets for Manila are as follows:
Here are a few typical costs in Chicago for activities, ticket prices, and tours that come from previous visitors:
Here are a few actual costs in Chicago for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
For more ideas for your next trip, check out The Best Free Things to Do in Chicago, Chicago Bucket List: The Best Places to See, and The Best Museums in Chicago.
Here are a few nightlife and alcohol tours and activities from local tour providers in Chicago:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Manila and Chicago, we can see that Chicago is more expensive. And not only is Manila much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Manila is in Asia and Chicago is in North America, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Manila would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Manila and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Chicago would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Chicago than you might in Manila.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Manila Expensive? and Is Chicago Expensive?.
Manila has a larger population, and is about 4 times larger than the population of Chicago. When comparing the sizes of Manila and Chicago, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Chicago has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Manila experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
The summer attracts plenty of travelers to both Manila and Chicago. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Manila year-round. Also, the beaches, the city activities, the music scene, and the family-friendly experiences are the main draw to Chicago this time of year.
Manila is around the same temperature as Chicago in the summer. The daily temperature in Manila averages around 27°C (80°F) in July, and Chicago fluctuates around 77°F (25°C).
Chicago receives a lot of rain in the summer. Manila gets a good bit of rain this time of year. In July, Manila usually receives more rain than Chicago. Manila gets 408 mm (16.1 in) of rain, while Chicago receives 3.9 inches (100 mm) of rain each month for the summer.
The autumn brings many poeple to Manila as well as Chicago. Manila attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate. Also, many travelers come to Chicago for the city's sights and attractions, the shopping scene, the music scene, and the natural beauty of the area.
In the autumn, Manila is much warmer than Chicago. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Manila in October average around 26°C (79°F), and Chicago averages at about 56°F (14°C).
Manila receives a lot of rain in the autumn. Manila usually gets more rain in October than Chicago. Manila gets 240 mm (9.4 in) of rain, while Chicago receives 2.2 inches (56 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Both Chicago and Manila are popular destinations to visit in the winter with plenty of activities. The warm climate attracts visitors to Manila throughout the year. Also, many visitors come to Chicago in the winter for the museums, the Christmas ambience, the shopping scene, the theater shows, and the cuisine.
Chicago can get quite cold in the winter. In January, Manila is generally much warmer than Chicago. Daily temperatures in Manila average around 24°C (76°F), and Chicago fluctuates around 25°F (-4°C).
In January, Manila usually receives less rain than Chicago. Manila gets 17 mm (0.7 in) of rain, while Chicago receives 1.9 inches (47 mm) of rain each month for the winter.
Both Chicago and Manila during the spring are popular places to visit. Plenty of visitors come to Manila because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year. Furthermore, most visitors come to Chicago for the beaches, the activities around the city, and the natural beauty during these months.
Manila is much warmer than Chicago in the spring. The daily temperature in Manila averages around 29°C (84°F) in April, and Chicago fluctuates around 52°F (11°C).
Chicago gets a good bit of rain this time of year. Manila usually gets less rain in April than Chicago. Manila gets 18 mm (0.7 in) of rain, while Chicago receives 4.3 inches (108 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Manila | Chicago | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 24°C (76°F) | 17 mm (0.7 in) | 25°F (-4°C) | 1.9 inches (47 mm) |
Feb | 25°C (77°F) | 5 mm (0.2 in) | 29°F (-2°C) | 1.4 inches (35 mm) |
Mar | 27°C (80°F) | 10 mm (0.4 in) | 41°F (5°C) | 3.7 inches (93 mm) |
Apr | 29°C (84°F) | 18 mm (0.7 in) | 52°F (11°C) | 4.3 inches (108 mm) |
May | 29°C (83°F) | 142 mm (5.6 in) | 63°F (17°C) | 3 inches (75 mm) |
Jun | 27°C (81°F) | 303 mm (11.9 in) | 73°F (23°C) | 3.9 inches (100 mm) |
Jul | 27°C (80°F) | 408 mm (16.1 in) | 77°F (25°C) | 3.9 inches (100 mm) |
Aug | 27°C (80°F) | 452 mm (17.8 in) | 76°F (24°C) | 3.5 inches (90 mm) |
Sep | 27°C (80°F) | 357 mm (14.1 in) | 68°F (20°C) | 3.8 inches (96 mm) |
Oct | 26°C (79°F) | 240 mm (9.4 in) | 56°F (14°C) | 2.2 inches (56 mm) |
Nov | 25°C (77°F) | 121 mm (4.8 in) | 44°F (7°C) | 2.2 inches (56 mm) |
Dec | 23°C (73°F) | 50 mm (2 in) | 31°F (-1°C) | 2.8 inches (71 mm) |