Which place is cheaper, Cuenca or Riga?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
Should I visit Riga or Cuenca? This is a common question asked by many travelers. By figuring out which city has activities that align with your interests along with knowing which is more affordable, you'll understand where you can get more bang for your buck. So, let's dive into the details and the data, which all comes from actual travelers.
Riga is the vibrant capital city of Latvia. It continues to gain popularity as a tourist destination in part because it is the base for the airline Air Baltic. This affordable airline offers discount flights around Europe and most of these flights pass through Riga with a forced overnight layover. This encourages travelers to visit this fascinating city for at least a night or two.
Cuenca is a vibrant colonial city in southern Ecuador, the third largest in the country, and the capital of Azuay Province. Cuenca is considered as Ecuador's most important and beautiful colonial city after Quito. Dating from the 16th century, Cuenca's historic center, a Unesco World Heritage Site with its trademark skyline of massive rotundas and soaring steeples, is a magical sight in which you will feel like you are moving back in time. Cuenca is the center of many craft traditions, including ceramics, metalwork and the internationally famous panama hat. The nearby villages also offer many other handicrafts. Tourists enjoy wandering the ancient streets discovering picturesque alleys and hidden corners, where nuns march along cobblestone streets and kids in Catholic-school uniforms skip past historic churches. Fascinating historic monuments and fabulous views are found at every turn. Cuenca also has outstanding art museums and festivals. For a rewarding cultural experience, visit during Easter to attend the Festival of Religious Music.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Wildlife Tours to Ecuador, and The Best Hiking & Trekking Tours in Ecuador.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations. These travel costs come from the actual spending of real travelers.
The average daily cost (per person) in Riga is $143, while the average daily cost in Cuenca is $53. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Riga and Cuenca in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Riga or Cuenca? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Riga:
Below are a few samples from actual travelers for transportation costs in Cuenca:
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Cuenca:
Prices for flights to both Cuenca and Riga change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Some typical examples of dining costs in Riga are as follows:
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Riga.
Below are a few samples from actual travelers for food and meal costs in Cuenca:
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Cuenca.
Some specific costs of activities, tours, and entrance tickets for Riga are as follows:
Here are a few actual costs in Cuenca for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
Also in Riga, these are the prices for nightlife and alcohol related activities from various tour providers:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Riga and Cuenca, we can see that Riga is more expensive. And not only is Cuenca much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Riga is in Europe and Cuenca is in South America, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Cuenca would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Cuenca and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Riga would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Riga than you might in Cuenca.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Riga Expensive? and Is Cuenca Expensive?.
Riga has a larger population, and is about 3 times larger than the population of Cuenca. When comparing the sizes of Riga and Cuenca, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Riga has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Cuenca experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
The summer attracts plenty of travelers to both Riga and Cuenca. Most visitors come to Riga for the city activities and the family-friendly experiences during these months. Cuenca attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate.
Riga is cooler than Cuenca in the summer. The daily temperature in Riga averages around 17°C (63°F) in July, and Cuenca fluctuates around 22°C (72°F).
In July, Riga usually receives more rain than Cuenca. Riga gets 79 mm (3.1 in) of rain, while Cuenca receives 17 mm (0.7 in) of rain each month for the summer.
The autumn brings many poeple to Riga as well as Cuenca. The autumn months attract visitors to Riga because of the city's sights and attractions, the shopping scene, and the natural beauty of the area. The warm climate attracts visitors to Cuenca throughout the year.
In the autumn, Riga is much colder than Cuenca. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Riga in October average around 7°C (45°F), and Cuenca averages at about 12°C (54°F).
Riga usually gets more rain in October than Cuenca. Riga gets 60 mm (2.4 in) of rain, while Cuenca receives 42 mm (1.7 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Cuenca and Riga are popular destinations to visit in the winter with plenty of activities. The museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine are the main draw to Riga this time of year. Plenty of visitors come to Cuenca because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year.
Be prepared for some very cold days in Cuenca. It's quite cold in Riga in the winter. In January, Riga is generally much colder than Cuenca. Daily temperatures in Riga average around -5°C (23°F), and Cuenca fluctuates around 4°C (39°F).
In January, Riga usually receives more rain than Cuenca. Riga gets 33 mm (1.3 in) of rain, while Cuenca receives 14 mm (0.6 in) of rain each month for the winter.
Both Cuenca and Riga during the spring are popular places to visit. Many travelers come to Riga for the activities around the city and the natural beauty. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Cuenca year-round.
Riga is much colder than Cuenca in the spring. The daily temperature in Riga averages around 5°C (42°F) in April, and Cuenca fluctuates around 10°C (50°F).
Riga usually gets more rain in April than Cuenca. Riga gets 39 mm (1.5 in) of rain, while Cuenca receives 35 mm (1.4 in) of rain this time of the year.
Riga | Cuenca | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | -5°C (23°F) | 33 mm (1.3 in) | 4°C (39°F) | 14 mm (0.6 in) |
Feb | -4°C (24°F) | 25 mm (1 in) | 6°C (43°F) | 22 mm (0.9 in) |
Mar | -0°C (31°F) | 31 mm (1.2 in) | 8°C (46°F) | 15 mm (0.6 in) |
Apr | 5°C (42°F) | 39 mm (1.5 in) | 10°C (50°F) | 35 mm (1.4 in) |
May | 12°C (53°F) | 43 mm (1.7 in) | 14°C (57°F) | 41 mm (1.6 in) |
Jun | 15°C (60°F) | 61 mm (2.4 in) | 19°C (66°F) | 35 mm (1.4 in) |
Jul | 17°C (63°F) | 79 mm (3.1 in) | 22°C (72°F) | 17 mm (0.7 in) |
Aug | 16°C (62°F) | 79 mm (3.1 in) | 22°C (72°F) | 23 mm (0.9 in) |
Sep | 12°C (54°F) | 76 mm (3 in) | 17°C (63°F) | 20 mm (0.8 in) |
Oct | 7°C (45°F) | 60 mm (2.4 in) | 12°C (54°F) | 42 mm (1.7 in) |
Nov | 2°C (36°F) | 61 mm (2.4 in) | 7°C (45°F) | 33 mm (1.3 in) |
Dec | -2°C (28°F) | 49 mm (1.9 in) | 5°C (41°F) | 15 mm (0.6 in) |