Which place is cheaper, Hiroshima or Aqaba?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
If you're trying to decide where to visit between Aqaba or Hiroshima, this travel comparison, which includes costs, can help. The overall cost of travel is usually a consideration when deciding where to go next, and the cost comparison down below can help you decide based on the average prices from other travelers along with your own travel budget.
Aqaba is a port city in Jordan, in fact, it is the only port city in the country. This city is located on the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea, which is in the southern part of Jordan. The city is still being developed; many of its facilities and infrastructures are being improved. The population of Aqaba is about 190,000 and the city has been key in developing Jordan's economy via trade and tourism.
Hiroshima is positioned on the coast of the Seto Inland Sea and is an industrial city made up of many zigzagging rivers and wide boulevard streets. Today Hiroshima is a modern and vibrant city with great food and an energetic nightlife, but the image that remains in most visitor's minds is the Hiroshima of 1945 when it became the horrific sight of the first atomic bomb attack. Hiroshima shares the colorful neon atmosphere of other major Japanese cities and its hard to recognize the city immortalized all those years ago on that fateful day.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Luxury Tours to Jordan, The Best Budget Tours to Jordan, The Best Adventure Tours to Japan, and The Best Sightseeing Tours in Japan.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Aqaba is $127, while the average daily cost in Hiroshima is $100. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Aqaba and Hiroshima in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Aqaba or Hiroshima? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Aqaba:
Also for Hiroshima, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Prices for flights to both Hiroshima and Aqaba change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Aqaba.
For Hiroshima, here are some samples of tours and activities related to meals and dining experiences:
Here are a few actual costs in Aqaba for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
Also, here are some specific examples of entertainment, tickets, and activities for Hiroshima.
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Aqaba and Hiroshima, we can see that Aqaba is more expensive. And not only is Hiroshima much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Aqaba is in Middle East and Hiroshima is in Asia, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Hiroshima would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Hiroshima and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Aqaba would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Aqaba than you might in Hiroshima.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Aqaba Expensive? and Is Hiroshima Expensive?.
Hiroshima has a larger population, and is about 10 times larger than the population of Aqaba. When comparing the sizes of Aqaba and Hiroshima, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Hiroshima has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Aqaba experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
Both Hiroshima and Aqaba during the summer are popular places to visit. Plenty of visitors come to Aqaba because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year. Also, many travelers come to Hiroshima for the family-friendly experiences.
Aqaba can become quite hot in the summer. In July, Aqaba is generally a little warmer than Hiroshima. Daily temperatures in Aqaba average around 33°C (91°F), and Hiroshima fluctuates around 26°C (79°F).
It's quite sunny in Aqaba. In the summer, Aqaba often gets more sunshine than Hiroshima. Aqaba gets 384 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Hiroshima receives 194 hours of full sun.
Hiroshima gets a good bit of rain this time of year. Aqaba usually gets less rain in July than Hiroshima. Aqaba gets 0 mm (0 in) of rain, while Hiroshima receives 238 mm (9.4 in) of rain this time of the year.
The autumn attracts plenty of travelers to both Aqaba and Hiroshima. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Aqaba year-round. Also, many visitors come to Hiroshima in the autumn for the shopping scene.
Aqaba is a little warmer than Hiroshima in the autumn. The daily temperature in Aqaba averages around 26°C (79°F) in October, and Hiroshima fluctuates around 17°C (63°F).
In Aqaba, it's very sunny this time of the year. Aqaba usually receives more sunshine than Hiroshima during autumn. Aqaba gets 295 hours of sunny skies, while Hiroshima receives 193 hours of full sun in the autumn.
Hiroshima receives a lot of rain in the autumn. In October, Aqaba usually receives less rain than Hiroshima. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while Hiroshima receives 102 mm (4 in) of rain each month for the autumn.
The winter brings many poeple to Aqaba as well as Hiroshima. Aqaba attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate. Also, most visitors come to Hiroshima for the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine during these months.
Hiroshima can be very cold during winter. In the winter, Aqaba is much warmer than Hiroshima. Typically, the winter temperatures in Aqaba in January average around 14°C (57°F), and Hiroshima averages at about 4°C (40°F).
People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Aqaba this time of the year. In the winter, Aqaba often gets more sunshine than Hiroshima. Aqaba gets 234 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Hiroshima receives 153 hours of full sun.
Aqaba usually gets less rain in January than Hiroshima. Aqaba gets 3 mm (0.1 in) of rain, while Hiroshima receives 49 mm (1.9 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Hiroshima and Aqaba are popular destinations to visit in the spring with plenty of activities. The warm climate attracts visitors to Aqaba throughout the year.
In April, Aqaba is generally much warmer than Hiroshima. Daily temperatures in Aqaba average around 24°C (75°F), and Hiroshima fluctuates around 14°C (56°F).
The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Aqaba. Aqaba usually receives more sunshine than Hiroshima during spring. Aqaba gets 282 hours of sunny skies, while Hiroshima receives 193 hours of full sun in the spring.
It rains a lot this time of the year in Hiroshima. In April, Aqaba usually receives less rain than Hiroshima. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while Hiroshima receives 168 mm (6.6 in) of rain each month for the spring.
Aqaba | Hiroshima | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 14°C (57°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 4°C (40°F) | 49 mm (1.9 in) |
Feb | 16°C (61°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 5°C (41°F) | 63 mm (2.5 in) |
Mar | 19°C (66°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 8°C (46°F) | 108 mm (4.3 in) |
Apr | 24°C (75°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 14°C (56°F) | 168 mm (6.6 in) |
May | 27°C (81°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 18°C (64°F) | 157 mm (6.2 in) |
Jun | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 22°C (71°F) | 260 mm (10.2 in) |
Jul | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 26°C (79°F) | 238 mm (9.4 in) |
Aug | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 27°C (81°F) | 117 mm (4.6 in) |
Sep | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 23°C (74°F) | 185 mm (7.3 in) |
Oct | 26°C (79°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 17°C (63°F) | 102 mm (4 in) |
Nov | 20°C (68°F) | 2 mm (0.1 in) | 12°C (53°F) | 67 mm (2.6 in) |
Dec | 15°C (59°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 7°C (44°F) | 37 mm (1.5 in) |