Which place is cheaper, Los Angeles or Woodstock?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
Should I visit Woodstock or Los Angeles? This is a common question asked by many travelers. By figuring out which city has activities that align with your interests along with knowing which is more affordable, you'll understand where you can get more bang for your buck. So, let's dive into the details and the data, which all comes from actual travelers.
While this town does lend its name to the 1969 Woodstock Festival, the legendary event was actually held on a dairy farm almost 60 miles away in Bethel, NY. So if you are looking to see the field where it all happened and a museum dedicated to its history, you will need to take a day trip outside of town.
Woodstock, New York, however, does stay true to the spirit of the arts. Since 1903, the place lay home to Byrdcliffe Art Colony, the oldest of its kind in the nation, and even attracted artists of the Hudson River School during the late 1800s. Today, artists from all disciplines-visual, ceramic, music, fiction, nonfiction, screenwriting, playwriting, and poetry-take up residence at the colony and have works displayed in galleries open in the main part of town.
Tinker Street and Mill Hill Road are lined with a mix of restaurants and shops all teeming with the essence of hippie living, arts, and spirituality. From shops selling Woodstock paraphernalia, incense, and Himalayan products, to yoga studios, vegan restaurants, and local art galleries-the town of Woodstock is one dedicated to keeping the spirit of the Woodstock Festival and the arts alive.
Los Angeles, California is probably one of the most well known cities in the United States. It is the second most populated metro area in the country with more than 17 million people. The city's diversity is wide reaching, giving it a character that is unique from any other place in the country. LA has many world famous sights and neighborhoods including Hollywood, Beverly Hills, Rodeo Drive, and Santa Monica, but there is really so much more to this city.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Luxury Tours to United States of America, The Best Tours for Seniors to United States of America, The Best Contiki Tours to United States of America, and The Best G Adventures Tours to United States of America.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Woodstock is $154, while the average daily cost in Los Angeles is $258. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Woodstock and Los Angeles in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Woodstock or Los Angeles? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Here are some examples of typical transportation prices from actual travelers in Los Angeles:
Also for Los Angeles, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Prices for flights to both Los Angeles and Woodstock change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
For Los Angeles, here are some examples of average food and meal prices for travelers:
For Los Angeles, here are some samples of tours and activities related to meals and dining experiences:
Below are a few sample prices from actual travelers for Los Angeles's activities, tours, and tickets:
For Los Angeles, here are a few prices for actual activities, tours, and tickets provided by various companies:
Here are a few nightlife and alcohol tours and activities from local tour providers in Los Angeles:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Woodstock and Los Angeles, we can see that Los Angeles is more expensive. And not only is Woodstock much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Woodstock would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Woodstock and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Los Angeles would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Los Angeles than you might in Woodstock.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Woodstock Expensive? and Is Los Angeles Expensive?.
Los Angeles has a larger population, and is about 1690 times larger than the population of Woodstock. When comparing the sizes of Woodstock and Los Angeles, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Both places have a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. As both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.
Both Los Angeles and Woodstock during the summer are popular places to visit. Also, the summer months attract visitors to Los Angeles because of the beaches, snorkeling, the hiking, the city activities, the music scene, and the family-friendly experiences.
In July, Woodstock is generally around the same temperature as Los Angeles. Daily temperatures in Woodstock average around 74°F (24°C), and Los Angeles fluctuates around 72°F (22°C).
Woodstock usually gets more rain in July than Los Angeles. Woodstock gets 3.4 inches (87 mm) of rain, while Los Angeles receives 0 inches (0 mm) of rain this time of the year.
The autumn attracts plenty of travelers to both Woodstock and Los Angeles. Also, the hiking trails, the city's sights and attractions, the shopping scene, and the music scene are the main draw to Los Angeles this time of year.
Woodstock is much colder than Los Angeles in the autumn. The daily temperature in Woodstock averages around 53°F (12°C) in October, and Los Angeles fluctuates around 64°F (18°C).
In October, Woodstock usually receives more rain than Los Angeles. Woodstock gets 3 inches (77 mm) of rain, while Los Angeles receives 0.6 inches (15 mm) of rain each month for the autumn.
The winter brings many poeple to Woodstock as well as Los Angeles. Also, many travelers come to Los Angeles for the museums, the shopping scene, the theater shows, and the cuisine.
It's quite cold in Woodstock in the winter. In the winter, Woodstock is much colder than Los Angeles. Typically, the winter temperatures in Woodstock in January average around 25°F (-4°C), and Los Angeles averages at about 55°F (13°C).
Woodstock usually gets around the same amount of rain in January as Los Angeles. Woodstock gets 3.3 inches (83 mm) of rain, while Los Angeles receives 3.1 inches (79 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Both Los Angeles and Woodstock are popular destinations to visit in the spring with plenty of activities. Also, many visitors come to Los Angeles in the spring for the beaches and the activities around the city.
In April, Woodstock is generally much colder than Los Angeles. Daily temperatures in Woodstock average around 49°F (10°C), and Los Angeles fluctuates around 61°F (16°C).
In April, Woodstock usually receives more rain than Los Angeles. Woodstock gets 3.7 inches (95 mm) of rain, while Los Angeles receives 1 inches (25 mm) of rain each month for the spring.
Woodstock | Los Angeles | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 25°F (-4°C) | 3.3 inches (83 mm) | 55°F (13°C) | 3.1 inches (79 mm) |
Feb | 28°F (-2°C) | 3.2 inches (81 mm) | 55°F (13°C) | 3 inches (76 mm) |
Mar | 38°F (3°C) | 3.8 inches (97 mm) | 57°F (14°C) | 2.8 inches (71 mm) |
Apr | 49°F (10°C) | 3.7 inches (95 mm) | 61°F (16°C) | 1 inches (25 mm) |
May | 60°F (16°C) | 3.5 inches (89 mm) | 63°F (17°C) | 0.4 inches (10 mm) |
Jun | 69°F (21°C) | 3.5 inches (90 mm) | 66°F (19°C) | 0.1 inches (3 mm) |
Jul | 74°F (24°C) | 3.4 inches (87 mm) | 72°F (22°C) | 0 inches (0 mm) |
Aug | 72°F (22°C) | 3.9 inches (100 mm) | 72°F (22°C) | 0 inches (0 mm) |
Sep | 64°F (18°C) | 3.5 inches (90 mm) | 70°F (21°C) | 0.2 inches (5 mm) |
Oct | 53°F (12°C) | 3 inches (77 mm) | 64°F (18°C) | 0.6 inches (15 mm) |
Nov | 43°F (6°C) | 4.3 inches (110 mm) | 63°F (17°C) | 1.2 inches (31 mm) |
Dec | 30°F (-1°C) | 4.1 inches (103 mm) | 57°F (14°C) | 2.6 inches (66 mm) |