Which place is cheaper, Kobe or Aqaba?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
If you're trying to decide where to visit between Aqaba or Kobe, this travel comparison, which includes costs, can help. The overall cost of travel is usually a consideration when deciding where to go next, and the cost comparison down below can help you decide based on the average prices from other travelers along with your own travel budget.
Aqaba is a port city in Jordan, in fact, it is the only port city in the country. This city is located on the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea, which is in the southern part of Jordan. The city is still being developed; many of its facilities and infrastructures are being improved. The population of Aqaba is about 190,000 and the city has been key in developing Jordan's economy via trade and tourism.
Located between the sea and the Rokko mountain range, Kobe is a port city in Japan also considered to be one of the country's most attractive. Though it was devastated by a historic earthquake in 1995, known locally as the Great Hanshin Earthquake, Kobe has fully recovered to its cosmopolitan splendor with plenty for visitors to see and do.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Luxury Tours to Jordan, The Best Budget Tours to Jordan, The Best 2-Week Tours from Tokyo, and The Best Family-Friendly Tours to Japan.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Aqaba is $127, while the average daily cost in Kobe is $103. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Aqaba and Kobe in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Aqaba or Kobe? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Aqaba:
Also for Kobe, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Prices for flights to both Kobe and Aqaba change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Aqaba.
For Kobe, here are some samples of tours and activities related to meals and dining experiences:
Here are a few actual costs in Aqaba for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
Also, here are some specific examples of entertainment, tickets, and activities for Kobe.
Here are a few nightlife and alcohol tours and activities from local tour providers in Kobe:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Aqaba and Kobe, we can see that Aqaba is more expensive. And not only is Kobe much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Aqaba is in Middle East and Kobe is in Asia, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Kobe would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Kobe and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Aqaba would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Aqaba than you might in Kobe.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Aqaba Expensive? and Is Kobe Expensive?.
Kobe has a larger population, and is about 20 times larger than the population of Aqaba. When comparing the sizes of Aqaba and Kobe, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Kobe has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Aqaba experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
Both Kobe and Aqaba during the summer are popular places to visit. Plenty of visitors come to Aqaba because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year. Furthermore, many visitors come to Kobe in the summer for the city activities and the family-friendly experiences.
The heat can be very extreme in Aqaba. In the summer, Aqaba is a little warmer than Kobe. Typically, the summer temperatures in Aqaba in July average around 33°C (91°F), and Kobe averages at about 27°C (80°F).
It's quite sunny in Aqaba. In the summer, Aqaba often gets more sunshine than Kobe. Aqaba gets 384 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Kobe receives 183 hours of full sun.
Kobe gets a good bit of rain this time of year. Aqaba usually gets less rain in July than Kobe. Aqaba gets 0 mm (0 in) of rain, while Kobe receives 157 mm (6.2 in) of rain this time of the year.
The autumn attracts plenty of travelers to both Aqaba and Kobe. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Aqaba year-round. Furthermore, most visitors come to Kobe for the city's sights and attractions and the shopping scene during these months.
In October, Aqaba is generally a little warmer than Kobe. Daily temperatures in Aqaba average around 26°C (79°F), and Kobe fluctuates around 18°C (65°F).
In Aqaba, it's very sunny this time of the year. Aqaba usually receives more sunshine than Kobe during autumn. Aqaba gets 295 hours of sunny skies, while Kobe receives 159 hours of full sun in the autumn.
Kobe receives a lot of rain in the autumn. In October, Aqaba usually receives less rain than Kobe. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while Kobe receives 102 mm (4 in) of rain each month for the autumn.
The winter brings many poeple to Aqaba as well as Kobe. Aqaba attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate. Additionally, the winter months attract visitors to Kobe because of the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine.
Aqaba is much warmer than Kobe in the winter. The daily temperature in Aqaba averages around 14°C (57°F) in January, and Kobe fluctuates around 5°C (42°F).
People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Aqaba this time of the year. In the winter, Aqaba often gets more sunshine than Kobe. Aqaba gets 234 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Kobe receives 140 hours of full sun.
Aqaba usually gets less rain in January than Kobe. Aqaba gets 3 mm (0.1 in) of rain, while Kobe receives 43 mm (1.7 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Kobe and Aqaba are popular destinations to visit in the spring with plenty of activities. The warm climate attracts visitors to Aqaba throughout the year. Also, the activities around the city are the main draw to Kobe this time of year.
In the spring, Aqaba is much warmer than Kobe. Typically, the spring temperatures in Aqaba in April average around 24°C (75°F), and Kobe averages at about 15°C (58°F).
The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Aqaba. Aqaba usually receives more sunshine than Kobe during spring. Aqaba gets 282 hours of sunny skies, while Kobe receives 176 hours of full sun in the spring.
It rains a lot this time of the year in Kobe. In April, Aqaba usually receives less rain than Kobe. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while Kobe receives 138 mm (5.4 in) of rain each month for the spring.
Aqaba | Kobe | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 14°C (57°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 5°C (42°F) | 43 mm (1.7 in) |
Feb | 16°C (61°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 5°C (42°F) | 51 mm (2 in) |
Mar | 19°C (66°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 9°C (47°F) | 92 mm (3.6 in) |
Apr | 24°C (75°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 15°C (58°F) | 138 mm (5.4 in) |
May | 27°C (81°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 19°C (66°F) | 143 mm (5.6 in) |
Jun | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 23°C (73°F) | 219 mm (8.6 in) |
Jul | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 27°C (80°F) | 157 mm (6.2 in) |
Aug | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 28°C (83°F) | 94 mm (3.7 in) |
Sep | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 24°C (76°F) | 167 mm (6.6 in) |
Oct | 26°C (79°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 18°C (65°F) | 102 mm (4 in) |
Nov | 20°C (68°F) | 2 mm (0.1 in) | 13°C (55°F) | 65 mm (2.5 in) |
Dec | 15°C (59°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 8°C (46°F) | 38 mm (1.5 in) |