Which place is cheaper, Nagasaki or Aqaba?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
If you're trying to decide where to visit between Aqaba or Nagasaki, this travel comparison, which includes costs, can help. The overall cost of travel is usually a consideration when deciding where to go next, and the cost comparison down below can help you decide based on the average prices from other travelers along with your own travel budget.
Aqaba is a port city in Jordan, in fact, it is the only port city in the country. This city is located on the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea, which is in the southern part of Jordan. The city is still being developed; many of its facilities and infrastructures are being improved. The population of Aqaba is about 190,000 and the city has been key in developing Jordan's economy via trade and tourism.
Set in a natural harbor on the northwest coast of Japan, Nagasaki is a Japanese city synonymous with a key moment during WWII after suffering an Allied nuclear attack in 1945. While the event is memorialized at the city's Atomic Bomb Museum and Peace Park, the city in no way is defined by the event. Today it exists as a culturally and religiously diverse port town with a certain charm amongst the terraces of surrounding hills.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Luxury Tours to Jordan, The Best Budget Tours to Jordan, The Best Coach Bus Tours in Japan, and The Best Adventure Tours to Japan.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Aqaba is $127, while the average daily cost in Nagasaki is $90. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Aqaba and Nagasaki in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Aqaba or Nagasaki? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Aqaba:
Also for Nagasaki, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Prices for flights to both Nagasaki and Aqaba change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Aqaba.
For Nagasaki, here are some samples of tours and activities related to meals and dining experiences:
Here are a few actual costs in Aqaba for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
For Nagasaki, here are a few prices for actual activities, tours, and tickets provided by various companies:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Aqaba and Nagasaki, we can see that Aqaba is more expensive. And not only is Nagasaki much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Aqaba is in Middle East and Nagasaki is in Asia, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Nagasaki would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Nagasaki and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Aqaba would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Aqaba than you might in Nagasaki.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Aqaba Expensive? and Is Nagasaki Expensive?.
Nagasaki has a larger population, and is about 4 times larger than the population of Aqaba. When comparing the sizes of Aqaba and Nagasaki, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Nagasaki has a temperate climate with four distinct seasons, but Aqaba experiences a warm climate with fairly sunny weather most of the year.
The summer brings many poeple to Aqaba as well as Nagasaki. Aqaba attracts visitors year-round for its warm weather and sunny climate. Also, most visitors come to Nagasaki for the city activities and the family-friendly experiences during these months.
The heat can be very extreme in Aqaba. In the summer, Aqaba is a little warmer than Nagasaki. Typically, the summer temperatures in Aqaba in July average around 33°C (91°F), and Nagasaki averages at about 27°C (81°F).
People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Aqaba this time of the year. In the summer, Aqaba often gets more sunshine than Nagasaki. Aqaba gets 384 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Nagasaki receives 197 hours of full sun.
It's quite rainy in Nagasaki. Aqaba usually gets less rain in July than Nagasaki. Aqaba gets 0 mm (0 in) of rain, while Nagasaki receives 334 mm (13.1 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Nagasaki and Aqaba are popular destinations to visit in the autumn with plenty of activities. The warm climate attracts visitors to Aqaba throughout the year. Also, the autumn months attract visitors to Nagasaki because of the city's sights and attractions and the shopping scene.
In October, Aqaba is generally a little warmer than Nagasaki. Daily temperatures in Aqaba average around 26°C (79°F), and Nagasaki fluctuates around 20°C (67°F).
The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Aqaba. Aqaba usually receives more sunshine than Nagasaki during autumn. Aqaba gets 295 hours of sunny skies, while Nagasaki receives 189 hours of full sun in the autumn.
It rains a lot this time of the year in Nagasaki. In October, Aqaba usually receives less rain than Nagasaki. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while Nagasaki receives 104 mm (4.1 in) of rain each month for the autumn.
Both Nagasaki and Aqaba during the winter are popular places to visit. Plenty of visitors come to Aqaba because of the warm climate and sunshine that lasts throughout the year. Furthermore, the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine are the main draw to Nagasaki this time of year.
Aqaba is much warmer than Nagasaki in the winter. The daily temperature in Aqaba averages around 14°C (57°F) in January, and Nagasaki fluctuates around 7°C (44°F).
It's quite sunny in Aqaba. In the winter, Aqaba often gets more sunshine than Nagasaki. Aqaba gets 234 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Nagasaki receives 112 hours of full sun.
Aqaba usually gets less rain in January than Nagasaki. Aqaba gets 3 mm (0.1 in) of rain, while Nagasaki receives 78 mm (3.1 in) of rain this time of the year.
The spring attracts plenty of travelers to both Aqaba and Nagasaki. Warm weather and sunshine bring visitors to Aqaba year-round. Furthermore, many travelers come to Nagasaki for the activities around the city.
In the spring, Aqaba is much warmer than Nagasaki. Typically, the spring temperatures in Aqaba in April average around 24°C (75°F), and Nagasaki averages at about 16°C (60°F).
In Aqaba, it's very sunny this time of the year. Aqaba usually receives more sunshine than Nagasaki during spring. Aqaba gets 282 hours of sunny skies, while Nagasaki receives 174 hours of full sun in the spring.
Nagasaki receives a lot of rain in the spring. In April, Aqaba usually receives less rain than Nagasaki. Aqaba gets 1 mm (0 in) of rain, while Nagasaki receives 175 mm (6.9 in) of rain each month for the spring.
Aqaba | Nagasaki | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 14°C (57°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 7°C (44°F) | 78 mm (3.1 in) |
Feb | 16°C (61°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 7°C (45°F) | 87 mm (3.4 in) |
Mar | 19°C (66°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 10°C (51°F) | 116 mm (4.6 in) |
Apr | 24°C (75°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 16°C (60°F) | 175 mm (6.9 in) |
May | 27°C (81°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 19°C (67°F) | 193 mm (7.6 in) |
Jun | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 23°C (73°F) | 328 mm (12.9 in) |
Jul | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 27°C (81°F) | 334 mm (13.1 in) |
Aug | 33°C (91°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 28°C (83°F) | 187 mm (7.4 in) |
Sep | 31°C (88°F) | 0 mm (0 in) | 25°C (77°F) | 191 mm (7.5 in) |
Oct | 26°C (79°F) | 1 mm (0 in) | 20°C (67°F) | 104 mm (4.1 in) |
Nov | 20°C (68°F) | 2 mm (0.1 in) | 14°C (58°F) | 85 mm (3.3 in) |
Dec | 15°C (59°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 9°C (48°F) | 67 mm (2.6 in) |