A Travel Price Comparison for United States of America Chicago vs. Pasadena for Attractions, Food, Nightlife, and Families

Should you visit Chicago or Pasadena?

Which is cheaper to visit? Which is more expensive for vacation?

Which city is more affordable and which is best for your travel style? If you're trying to figure out where to go next, comparing the travel costs between Chicago and Pasadena can help you decide which place is right for you.

Chicago

Chicago is a edgey, cosmopolitan, and diverse city. Visitors will also find so much to do here because it's a large city with many sights and attractions. It offers plenty of beauty for visitors. Other popular activities here include theater, nightlife, and live music.

Pasadena

Pasadena is a quaint, charming, and picturesque city. Other popular activities here include shopping, museums, and nightlife.

Chicago and Pasadena: Pros and Cons

Is there more to do in Chicago or Pasadena?

Tourists will generally find more to do in Chicago than Pasadena. It is bigger and it has more sights, attractions, and activities for travelers. Chicago is more touristy than Pasadena and is known for its thriving sports scene, its iconic local cuisine, and its world class shopping at the Magnificent Mile. It is also well known for The Willis Tower (previously the Sears Tower). Pasadena is famous for being the home of the Tournament of Roses and the Rose Bowl.

How is Chicago different from Pasadena?

Which is Better for a Holiday?

Let's take a look at the differences and similarities between Pasadena and Chicago. Then, you can decide for yourself which place is better for your next trip.

Are the Museums and Historical Sights Better in Chicago or Pasadena?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its sights and museums. Also, Pasadena is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for its museums and history.

You'll find many recognizable landmarks that put Chicago on the map. There are countless landmarks, museums, and iconic sights in the area. Some of the most famous are the Art Institute of Chicago, Adler Planetarium, and the Museum of Science and Industry. Notable landmarks include the famous Willis Tower - formerly the Sears Tower, Buckingham Fountain, and the iconic Cloud Gate (the bean).

Pasadena offers many unique museums, sights, and landmarks that will make for a memorable trip. There's a good number of museums around town that include kids' museums, art museums, and local museums. Popular museums include the USC Pacific Asia Museum, the Norton Simon Museum, and the Pasadena Museum of History. Many people also enjoy touring the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Theater?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its shows and theatre. However, Pasadena is not a theatre destination.

Chicago is considered to be a world-class theater destination. Theater is big here with many of the major Broadway productions visiting the city. There is also an endless list of smaller, local theaters to choose from.

Pasadena is not a theatre destination.

Is the Food Better in Chicago or Pasadena? Which Destination has the Best Restaurants?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its local cuisine and restaurants. Also, Pasadena is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for its restaurants.

Eat your way through Chicago, as it has many local or world renowned restaurants to choose from. With everything from award-winning luxury restaurants to local dives, this city has something for everyone. It also has very distinct local flavors and dishes that create an identity and bring great pride to the locals. While you're in town you have to try the famous deep dish pizza, Chicago style hot dogs, and Italian beef.

The food selection at local restaurants is excellent in Pasadena. Local restaurants feature southern California cuisine as well as international flavors. Dishes often use local ingredients that are fresh and seasonal. Restaurants range from casual to fine dining and the atmosphere is warm and welcoming.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Nightlife?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its evening party scene. Also, Pasadena is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for nightlife.

Chicago has a colorful and one-of-a-kind nightlife scene. It has a wide range of activities at night, with everything from theater and comedy clubs to dance venues, sporting events, and local bars. It's easy to fill many evenings with whatever activity appeals to you. Popular bars and clubs include the Smart Bar, Beauty Bar, and Le Nocturne.

Pasadena has a lively atmosphere and nightlife is popular here. Much of the nightlife scene is concentrated around Old Pasadena. You'll find clubs, bars, and lounges that begin the evening with Happy Hours and then become more party-focused as the evening progresses.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Music?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its music scene. However, Pasadena is not a live music destination.

In Chicago you'll find nightly musicians performing at a variety of venues. The city is the birthplace of such interesting styles as modern gospel and the Chicago style blues.

Pasadena is not a live music destination.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Beaches?

Chicago is a good destination for the beach. However, Pasadena is not a beach destination.

Chicago offers a nice beach destination. While you don't immediately think of beaches when you think of Chicago, there are some nice beaches by the lake. If the weather is nice, it's a great area to spend some time.

Pasadena is not a beach destination.

Is the Shopping Better in Chicago or Pasadena?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its shopping areas. Also, Pasadena is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for shopping.

Chicago is a world class destination for shoppers. There are countless neighborhoods that are filled with boutiques, local vendors, and art galleries. The city has some of the country's best shopping opportunities, and the most notable area is the famous Michigan Avenue and the Magnificent Mile.

Shopping is a popular activity when visiting Pasadena. Old Pasadena is where you'll find some of the best shopping. It's filled with a charming atmosphere and interesting boutiques.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Christmas?

Chicago is notable for its Christmas activities. However, Pasadena does not offer Christmas activities.

Chicago is an extremely popular place to visit during the Christmas season. There's a number of seasonal celebrations, ice skating, and excellent shopping.

Pasadena does not offer Christmas activities.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Christmas Markets?

Chicago is a good destination for its Christmas markets. However, Pasadena does not offer Christmas markets.

Visiting the Christmas markets is popular in Chicago. Shopping is a highlight of a trip to the city, and the Christkindlmarkt is not to be missed.

Pasadena does not offer Christmas markets.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Families?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its family-friendly activities. Also, Pasadena is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for its kid-friendly activities.

With a huge array of activities for kids, Chicago is very family-friendly. The city has a large number of activities for kids, including zoos, Shedd Aquarium, impressive children's museums, and large and elaborate playgrounds in Millennium Park. It's easy to keep kids entertained in this very kid-focused city.

Pasadena is a family-friendly city. There are a number of kid-friendly museums around town including Kidspace Children's Museum. There are also nature centers, playgrounds, and plenty of family-friendly restaurants.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Couples?

Both Chicago and Pasadena are nice destinations to visit as a couple.

Chicago is a good city for couples to visit. Couples will enjoy exploring the city's vibrant theater scene and diverse neighborhoods. There are many varied restaurants and entertainment options that make for a great date night. There are also sporting events, parks, and gardens where couples can explore.

Pasadena is a nice destination for couples. It's a charming town with a bit of a European vibe and plenty of outdoor activities. Fine dining and interesting shopping make this a nice weekend destination.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Backpackers and Budget Travelers?

Chicago is a good destination for backpackers. However, Pasadena is a mediocre city for backpackers and budget travelers.

Plenty of backpackers visit Chicago. The city doesn't have a huge backpacker vibe, but it does have a number of hostels that help keep costs in check.

Pasadena is a challenging destination for budget travelers and backpackers due to the higher prices. It's not high on the list for most backpackers.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Students?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for students. However, Pasadena is not popular with students.

Chicago is a very popular place to visit for students. The city has a large number of universities that bring in students from around the country and around the globe. It's a huge international city with economic ties and many opportunities connected to the universities.

Pasadena is not popular with students.

Is Chicago or Pasadena Better for Public Transit? Which Is Easier to Get Around Without a Car?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its public transit. Also, Pasadena is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for times when you don't have a car.

Public transit in Chicago is top-notch. There's a subway (the "L"), a commuter well, as well as buses and countless taxis available.

Pasadena has some public transit options. Buses and light rail offer local transit and connect the city to nearby Los Angeles.

Is Chicago or Pasadena a more walkable city?

Chicago is notable for its ease of walking around. Also, Pasadena is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for its walkability.

Chicago is a very walkable destination. The city has many restaurants, sights, and hotels that are easily accessible on foot.

Pasadena is somewhat walkable. Most people head to Old Pasadena, which is the most concentrated and walkable part of the city.

For even more information, also check out Is Chicago Worth Visiting? and Is Pasadena Worth Visiting?.

Should I spend more time in Pasadena or Chicago?

How long in Chicago or Pasadena?

Visitors can find plenty of fun things to do in both Chicago and Pasadena. With generally more activities and things to do, visitors tend to spend more time in Chicago than in Pasadena. Usually, 3-5 days is a good amount of time for Chicago, and 1-3 days is enough time in Pasadena.

Families should spend more time in Chicago than Pasadena. Because of the many family-friendly attractions and fun things to do for kids in Chicago, it's a great place to visit with the whole family.

Couples should spend more time in Chicago than Pasadena. You'll find plenty of romantic sights and fun activities in Chicago that are great for a weekend getaway or a longer couple's trip.

Backpackers and budget travelers should spend more time in Chicago than Pasadena if your budget allows for it. With a larger number of budget-friendly sights, good nightlife, and active things to do, anyone traveling on a budget would have a good time in Chicago.

One day in Chicago or Pasadena?

Chicago is a big city with plenty to do. With so much to do, one day is probably not enough time to see everything. It will give you the chance to have new experiences.

In Pasadena, you'll find nightlife and food. This city offers something for everyone. This would be the perfect place to spend one day, as it has just the right amount of activities.

A weekend in Chicago or Pasadena?

Chicago is a popular place that is full of things to see and experience. But since there are so many activities, you'll likely want to spend more than a weekend exploring. Take your pick from the many activities offered here.

In Pasadena, you'll find food and shopping. The length of your trip often depends on your style of travel. A weekend here is typical. A weekend is a great amount of time to relax and see the many things that Pasadena has to offer.

Five days in Chicago or Pasadena?

Chicago is a popular choice for travelers. Five days here is typical. While some people choose to spend more or less time in Chicago, five days is sufficent for most. The entire region has so many activities, and you'll want time to do everything.

Pasadena is a great place to explore. Five days is more than enough time to enjoy everything. Take some day trips to nearby places to fill the extra days. Anyone can find something fun to do here.

A week in Chicago or Pasadena?

Chicago is a great place to explore. One week is more than enough time to enjoy everything. Take some day trips to nearby places to fill the extra days. This city offers something for everyone.

It's hard to know how much time to spend in Pasadena. Many people enjoy the museums and nightlife when visiting Pasadena. One week may feel like too much time unless you plan to do a lot of relaxing.

For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Family-Friendly Tours to United States of America, The Best Wildlife Tours to United States of America, The Best Hiking & Trekking Tours in United States of America, and The Best Historical Tours in United States of America.

When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Chicago and Pasadena, we can see that Chicago is more expensive. And not only is Pasadena much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Pasadena would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Pasadena and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Chicago would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Chicago than you might in Pasadena.

If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Chicago Expensive? and Is Pasadena Expensive?.

Which is Bigger, Chicago or Pasadena?

Chicago has a larger population, and is about 20 times larger than the population of Pasadena. When comparing the sizes of Chicago and Pasadena, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.

When is the best time to visit Chicago or Pasadena?

Both destinations experience a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. And since both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.

Should I visit Chicago or Pasadena in the Summer?

The summer attracts plenty of travelers to both Chicago and Pasadena. Many visitors come to Chicago in the summer for the beaches, the city activities, the music scene, and the family-friendly experiences. Furthermore, most visitors come to Pasadena for the family-friendly experiences during these months.

Chicago is around the same temperature as Pasadena in the summer. The daily temperature in Chicago averages around 77°F (25°C) in July, and Pasadena fluctuates around 73°F (23°C).

Chicago gets a good bit of rain this time of year. In July, Chicago usually receives more rain than Pasadena. Chicago gets 3.9 inches (100 mm) of rain, while Pasadena receives 0 inches (0 mm) of rain each month for the summer.

Should I visit Chicago or Pasadena in the Autumn?

The autumn brings many poeple to Chicago as well as Pasadena. Most visitors come to Chicago for the city's sights and attractions, the shopping scene, the music scene, and the natural beauty of the area during these months. Additionally, the autumn months attract visitors to Pasadena because of the shopping scene.

In the autumn, Chicago is cooler than Pasadena. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Chicago in October average around 56°F (14°C), and Pasadena averages at about 68°F (20°C).

Chicago usually gets more rain in October than Pasadena. Chicago gets 2.2 inches (56 mm) of rain, while Pasadena receives 0.3 inches (7 mm) of rain this time of the year.

Should I visit Chicago or Pasadena in the Winter?

Both Pasadena and Chicago are popular destinations to visit in the winter with plenty of activities. The winter months attract visitors to Chicago because of the museums, the Christmas ambience, the shopping scene, the theater shows, and the cuisine. Also, the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine are the main draw to Pasadena this time of year.

The weather in Chicago can be very cold. In January, Chicago is generally much colder than Pasadena. Daily temperatures in Chicago average around 25°F (-4°C), and Pasadena fluctuates around 56°F (13°C).

In January, Chicago usually receives less rain than Pasadena. Chicago gets 1.9 inches (47 mm) of rain, while Pasadena receives 2.5 inches (63 mm) of rain each month for the winter.

Should I visit Chicago or Pasadena in the Spring?

Both Pasadena and Chicago during the spring are popular places to visit. The beaches, the activities around the city, and the natural beauty are the main draw to Chicago this time of year.

Chicago is cooler than Pasadena in the spring. The daily temperature in Chicago averages around 52°F (11°C) in April, and Pasadena fluctuates around 62°F (17°C).

It rains a lot this time of the year in Chicago. Chicago usually gets more rain in April than Pasadena. Chicago gets 4.3 inches (108 mm) of rain, while Pasadena receives 0.7 inches (17 mm) of rain this time of the year.

Typical Weather for Pasadena and Chicago