A Travel Price Comparison for United States of America Chicago vs. Redwood National Park for Families, Backpackers, Couples, and Beaches

Should you visit Chicago or Redwood National Park?

Which is cheaper to visit? Which is more expensive for vacation?

Which city is more affordable and which is best for your travel style? If you're trying to figure out where to go next, comparing the travel costs between Chicago and Redwood National Park can help you decide which place is right for you.

Chicago

Chicago is a edgey, cosmopolitan, and diverse city. Visitors will also find so much to do here because it's a large city with many sights and attractions. It offers plenty of beauty for visitors. Other popular activities here include theater, nightlife, and live music.

Redwood National Park

Redwood National Park is a monumental, grand, and impressive park. The famous beauty of this place is one of the main draws. Other popular activities here include beaches and hiking.

Chicago and Redwood National Park: Pros and Cons

Is there more to do in Chicago or Redwood National Park?

Travelers will usually find more to do in Chicago. Although Chicago and Redwood National Park are popular destinations, Chicago has more sights and attractions for tourists. Chicago is very popular for its museums, theatre productions, food, nightlife, music, shopping, christmas markets, and big city activities, while Redwood National Park attracts visitors for its hiking and impressive beauty. Chicago is famous for its thriving sports scene, its iconic local cuisine, and its world class shopping at the Magnificent Mile. It is also well known for The Willis Tower (previously the Sears Tower). Redwood National Park is famous for being the home of the world's tallest trees.

How is Chicago different from Redwood National Park?

Which is Better for a Holiday?

Let's take a look at the differences and similarities between Redwood National Park and Chicago. Then, you can decide for yourself which place is better for your next trip.

Are the Museums and Historical Sights Better in Chicago or Redwood National Park?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its museums and landmarks. However, Redwood National Park is not particularly known for its historical sights.

You'll find many recognizable landmarks that put Chicago on the map. There are countless landmarks, museums, and iconic sights in the area. Some of the most famous are the Art Institute of Chicago, Adler Planetarium, and the Museum of Science and Industry. Notable landmarks include the famous Willis Tower - formerly the Sears Tower, Buckingham Fountain, and the iconic Cloud Gate (the bean).

If you're looking to pass the time, head to a museum or historic sight in Redwood National Park. There is little in the form of museums, but you can visit the Thomas H. Kuchel Visitor Center on the south side of the park and see exhibits about Yurok culture and the area's ecology.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Theater?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its shows and theatre. However, Redwood National Park is not a theatre destination.

Chicago is considered to be a world-class theater destination. Theater is big here with many of the major Broadway productions visiting the city. There is also an endless list of smaller, local theaters to choose from.

Redwood National Park is not a theatre destination.

Is the Food Better in Chicago or Redwood National Park? Which Destination has the Best Restaurants?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its restaurant scene. However, Redwood National Park is not particularly known for its local flavors and cuisine.

Eat your way through Chicago, as it has many local or world renowned restaurants to choose from. With everything from award-winning luxury restaurants to local dives, this city has something for everyone. It also has very distinct local flavors and dishes that create an identity and bring great pride to the locals. While you're in town you have to try the famous deep dish pizza, Chicago style hot dogs, and Italian beef.

While Redwood National Park is not famous for its food, you'll find what you need there. There are no dining or grocery options within the park but there are some options just outside the park.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Nightlife?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its evening party scene. However, Redwood National Park is not particularly known for nightlife.

Chicago has a colorful and one-of-a-kind nightlife scene. It has a wide range of activities at night, with everything from theater and comedy clubs to dance venues, sporting events, and local bars. It's easy to fill many evenings with whatever activity appeals to you. Popular bars and clubs include the Smart Bar, Beauty Bar, and Le Nocturne.

The nightlife scene is quiet in Redwood National Park The laid back setting offers little in the form of nightlife.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Music?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its music scene. However, Redwood National Park is not a live music destination.

In Chicago you'll find nightly musicians performing at a variety of venues. The city is the birthplace of such interesting styles as modern gospel and the Chicago style blues.

Redwood National Park is not a live music destination.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Beaches?

Chicago and Redwood National Park are nice choices for a beach vacation.

Many people head to Chicago to enjoy the beach. While you don't immediately think of beaches when you think of Chicago, there are some nice beaches by the lake. If the weather is nice, it's a great area to spend some time.

Redwood National Park has a beach worth visiting. The park runs along the Pacific coastline and there are 70 miles of coastal trail in the park. Beaches are rugged and sandy and favorite sections include Gold Bluff Beach, Crescent Beach, and Enderts Beach, which has great tidal pools.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Hiking?

Redwood National Park is renowned for its hiking experiences. However, Chicago is not a hiking destination.

Many people visit Redwood National Park specifically for its hiking. Hikes range from coastal trails to world-renowned hikes through the redwoods. You'll feel humbled in the presence of these grand and majestic trees. Several of the most well-known hikes include Fern Canyon, the Cathedral Trees Trail, and Redwood Creek Trail.

Chicago is not a hiking destination.

Is the Shopping Better in Chicago or Redwood National Park?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its shopping areas. However, Redwood National Park is not particularly known for shopping.

Chicago is a world class destination for shoppers. There are countless neighborhoods that are filled with boutiques, local vendors, and art galleries. The city has some of the country's best shopping opportunities, and the most notable area is the famous Michigan Avenue and the Magnificent Mile.

Shopping in Redwood National Park can be found for those interested. You'll find park stores at the visitor centers if you want to pick up a small gift or souvenir.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Christmas?

Chicago is well known for its Christmas activities. However, Redwood National Park does not offer Christmas activities.

Visitors come from all around to experience the Christmas activities in Chicago. There's a number of seasonal celebrations, ice skating, and excellent shopping.

Redwood National Park does not offer Christmas activities.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Christmas Markets?

Chicago is a good destination for its Christmas markets. However, Redwood National Park does not offer Christmas markets.

Visiting the Christmas markets is popular in Chicago. Shopping is a highlight of a trip to the city, and the Christkindlmarkt is not to be missed.

Redwood National Park does not offer Christmas markets.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Families?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its family-friendly activities. Also, Redwood National Park is still popular, but not quite as popular for its kid-friendly activities.

With a huge array of activities for kids, Chicago is very family-friendly. The city has a large number of activities for kids, including zoos, Shedd Aquarium, impressive children's museums, and large and elaborate playgrounds in Millennium Park. It's easy to keep kids entertained in this very kid-focused city.

Redwood National Park is a very family-friendly destination. There are plenty of kid-friendly hikes in the park and the kids will love exploring the varied landscapes and diverse ecosystems. Less than a mile long, Fern Canyon is the perfect hike for little kids and it's not-to-be-missed. Cathedral Trees Trail is three miles, and also a highlight of any trip to the park.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Couples?

Redwood National Park is a great destination for couples. Also, Chicago is still popular, but not quite as popular for romance.

Couples visit Redwood National Park frequently as it offers plenty of romantic activities. There are historic lodges that make for a romantic getaway. You can fill your days with hikes through magical landscapes and breathtaking settings surrounded by the impressive redwoods.

Chicago is a nice destination for couples. Couples will enjoy exploring the city's vibrant theater scene and diverse neighborhoods. There are many varied restaurants and entertainment options that make for a great date night. There are also sporting events, parks, and gardens where couples can explore.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Backpackers and Budget Travelers?

Redwood National Park is renowned for backpackers. Also, Chicago is still popular, but not quite as popular for backpackers and budget travelers.

Redwood National Park is a very popular park to visit for backpackers. There are miles of backcountry trails that let you can explore the park in relative peace and solitude. This is an amazing way to experience the park, but do make sure you purchase a permit in advance.

It's common for backpackers to visit Chicago. The city doesn't have a huge backpacker vibe, but it does have a number of hostels that help keep costs in check.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Students?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for students. However, Redwood National Park is not popular with students.

Chicago is a very popular place to visit for students. The city has a large number of universities that bring in students from around the country and around the globe. It's a huge international city with economic ties and many opportunities connected to the universities.

Redwood National Park is not popular with students.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park Better for Public Transit? Which Is Easier to Get Around Without a Car?

Chicago is an amazing city to visit for its public transit. However, Redwood National Park is not particularly known for times when you don't have a car.

Public transit in Chicago is top-notch. There's a subway (the "L"), a commuter well, as well as buses and countless taxis available.

Public transit is quite limited in Redwood National Park. There's no public transportation within the park.

Is Chicago or Redwood National Park a more walkable city?

Chicago is well known for its ease of walking around. However, Redwood National Park is not particularly known for its walkability.

Chicago is a very walkable destination. The city has many restaurants, sights, and hotels that are easily accessible on foot.

Redwood National Park is not a very walkable city. The park is large and spread out, so you'll need a car to get around.

For even more information, also check out Is Chicago Worth Visiting? and Is Redwood National Park Worth Visiting?.

Should I spend more time in Redwood National Park or Chicago?

How long in Chicago or Redwood National Park?

In either Chicago or Redwood National Park, you'll find plenty of activities to fill your time. In our opinion, Chicago has more to see and do, so we recommend that you spend more time in Chicago than Redwood National Park. However, 3-5 days is a good amount of time to spend in either destination.

Families should spend more time in Chicago than Redwood National Park. Because of the many family-friendly attractions and fun things to do for kids in Chicago, it's a great place to visit with the whole family.

Couples should spend more time in Chicago than Redwood National Park. You'll find plenty of romantic sights and fun activities in Chicago that are great for a weekend getaway or a longer couple's trip.

Backpackers and budget travelers should spend more time in Chicago than Redwood National Park if your budget allows for it. With a larger number of budget-friendly sights, good nightlife, and active things to do, anyone traveling on a budget would have a good time in Chicago.

One day in Chicago or Redwood National Park?

Because Chicago is a large city, there are a variety of ways to spend your time. Anyone can find something fun to do here. Since there is so much to do in the area, one day is probably not enough for all of it.

In Redwood National Park, you'll find . Many travelers plan to spend time hiking while in the area. One reason most visitors come is for the hiking. This park offers something for everyone. One day is usually not enough time for a trip here as there is plenty to do.

A weekend in Chicago or Redwood National Park?

It's hard to know how much time to spend in Chicago. A weekend is usually not enough time for a trip here as there is plenty to do. It offers something for everyone.

In Redwood National Park, you'll find . The length of your trip often depends on your style of travel. Hiking can easily take up a good amount of your time here, too. One reason most visitors come is for the hiking. Since there is so much to do in the area, a weekend is probably not enough for all of it.

Five days in Chicago or Redwood National Park?

Chicago is a fun place to experience. If you have five days, this is a great place to go. In five days, you should have a good grasp of this city. Your budget might influence how long you stay.

Redwood National Park is a great place to explore. It is common to spend five days here. Hikers are also drawn to this area. Five days is a great amount of time to relax and see the many things that Redwood National Park has to offer. Anyone can find something fun to do here.

A week in Chicago or Redwood National Park?

You'll find live music and food around the multicultural big city of Chicago. It has many unique tourist attractions and fascinating things to do. Most people find that one week is more than enough time to see everything.

It's hard to know how much time to spend in Redwood National Park. Many people enjoy the when visiting Redwood National Park. One reason most visitors come is for the hiking. Many visitors also spend a good bit of time hiking. One week may feel like too much time unless you plan to do a lot of relaxing.

For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Family-Friendly Tours to United States of America, The Best Wildlife Tours to United States of America, The Best Hiking & Trekking Tours in United States of America, and The Best Historical Tours in United States of America.

When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Chicago and Redwood National Park, we can see that Chicago is more expensive. And not only is Redwood National Park much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Redwood National Park would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Redwood National Park and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Chicago would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Chicago than you might in Redwood National Park.

If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Chicago Expensive? and Is Redwood National Park Expensive?.

When is the best time to visit Chicago or Redwood National Park?

Both destinations experience a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. And since both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.

Should I visit Chicago or Redwood National Park in the Summer?

Both Redwood National Park and Chicago are popular destinations to visit in the summer with plenty of activities. Many visitors come to Chicago in the summer for the beaches, the city activities, the music scene, and the family-friendly experiences. Also, most visitors come to Redwood National Park for the beaches, the hiking, and the family-friendly experiences during these months.

Chicago is much warmer than Redwood National Park in the summer. The daily temperature in Chicago averages around 77°F (25°C) in July, and Redwood National Park fluctuates around 57°F (14°C).

It's quite sunny in Redwood National Park. The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Chicago. Chicago usually receives more sunshine than Redwood National Park during summer. Chicago gets 326 hours of sunny skies, while Redwood National Park receives 274 hours of full sun in the summer.

It's quite rainy in Chicago. In July, Chicago usually receives more rain than Redwood National Park. Chicago gets 3.9 inches (100 mm) of rain, while Redwood National Park receives 0.1 inches (3 mm) of rain each month for the summer.

Should I visit Chicago or Redwood National Park in the Autumn?

Both Redwood National Park and Chicago during the autumn are popular places to visit. Most visitors come to Chicago for the city's sights and attractions, the shopping scene, the music scene, and the natural beauty of the area during these months. Furthermore, the autumn months attract visitors to Redwood National Park because of the hiking trails and the natural beauty of the area.

In the autumn, Chicago is around the same temperature as Redwood National Park. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Chicago in October average around 56°F (14°C), and Redwood National Park averages at about 55°F (13°C).

In the autumn, Chicago often gets more sunshine than Redwood National Park. Chicago gets 195 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Redwood National Park receives 177 hours of full sun.

Chicago usually gets less rain in October than Redwood National Park. Chicago gets 2.2 inches (56 mm) of rain, while Redwood National Park receives 2.7 inches (68 mm) of rain this time of the year.

Should I visit Chicago or Redwood National Park in the Winter?

The winter attracts plenty of travelers to both Chicago and Redwood National Park. The winter months attract visitors to Chicago because of the museums, the Christmas ambience, the shopping scene, the theater shows, and the cuisine.

The weather in Chicago can be very cold. In January, Chicago is generally much colder than Redwood National Park. Daily temperatures in Chicago average around 25°F (-4°C), and Redwood National Park fluctuates around 48°F (9°C).

Chicago usually receives around the same amount of sunshine as Redwood National Park during winter. Chicago gets 134 hours of sunny skies, while Redwood National Park receives 135 hours of full sun in the winter.

Redwood National Park receives a lot of rain in the winter. In January, Chicago usually receives less rain than Redwood National Park. Chicago gets 1.9 inches (47 mm) of rain, while Redwood National Park receives 6 inches (152 mm) of rain each month for the winter.

Should I visit Chicago or Redwood National Park in the Spring?

The spring brings many poeple to Chicago as well as Redwood National Park. The beaches, the activities around the city, and the natural beauty are the main draw to Chicago this time of year. Additionally, many travelers come to Redwood National Park for the beaches and the natural beauty.

Chicago is around the same temperature as Redwood National Park in the spring. The daily temperature in Chicago averages around 52°F (11°C) in April, and Redwood National Park fluctuates around 50°F (10°C).

The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Redwood National Park. People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Chicago this time of the year. In the spring, Chicago often gets less sunshine than Redwood National Park. Chicago gets 218 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Redwood National Park receives 254 hours of full sun.

Chicago receives a lot of rain in the spring. Chicago usually gets more rain in April than Redwood National Park. Chicago gets 4.3 inches (108 mm) of rain, while Redwood National Park receives 2.9 inches (73 mm) of rain this time of the year.

Typical Weather for Redwood National Park and Chicago