Which place is cheaper, New Orleans or Oslo?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
If you're trying to decide where to visit between Oslo or New Orleans, this travel comparison, which includes costs, can help. The overall cost of travel is usually a consideration when deciding where to go next, and the cost comparison down below can help you decide based on the average prices from other travelers along with your own travel budget.
Oslo is a green, clean, and progressive city. It's a large city with plenty of activites for visitors as well. Other reasons to visit include nightlife, food, and museums.
New Orleans is a vibrant, energetic, and fun-filled city. Since it's a large city, you'll find plenty of things to do. This is a quaint and attractive place to visit, too. It's also known for nightlife, live music, and food.
Tourists will generally find more to do in New Orleans. Although Oslo and New Orleans are both popular with visitors, New Orleans has more sights, activities, and attractions for travelers. New Orleans is more popular for its food, nightlife, music, historical sights, and quaint atmosphere, while Oslo is known for its museums and big city activities. New Orleans is more touristy than Oslo and is popular for its jazz festivals, local cuisine, quaint balconies, and world class Mardi Gras parties. It is also home to The French Quarter. Oslo is popular for its Viking history, its locally caught seafood, its maritime museums, and its access to winter sports.
Let's take a look at the differences and similarities between New Orleans and Oslo. Then, you can decide for yourself which place is better for your next trip.
Oslo is an excellent place to visit for its museums and history. However, New Orleans does not have museums and landmarks.
You'll find a good number of museums and monuments packed into Oslo. Famous sights around town include the Akershus Fortress, the Folk Museum of Norway, and the Munch Museum.
New Orleans does not have museums and landmarks.
New Orleans is an amazing city to visit for its local cuisine and restaurants. Also, Oslo is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for its restaurants.
Known for it's food and restaurant scene, New Orleans is always at the top of any foodie's travel list. It has rapidly grown into one of the United State's most well known foodie destinations. It's the birthplace of bananas foster and popular for it's gumbo, crawfish etouffee, jambalaya, and red beans and rice. While there are a number of celebrity chefs from New Orleans, you'll also find many local restaurants that aren't as well known but are equally worth visiting.
Oslo has a delicious restaurant scene that relies on local flavors. The city has a reputation of serving a lot of cured meats and potato dishes, but there is actually a good amount of variation available. Local favorites include smoked salmon, meatballs, and meat stews.
New Orleans is an amazing city to visit for nightlife. Also, Oslo is not as famous, but is still a good city to visit for nightlife and partying.
New Orleans has a colorful and one-of-a-kind nightlife scene. The nightlife scene is at its best during Mardi Gras. But year-round you'll find Bachelor and Bachelorette parties, spring breakers, and anyone who wants to enjoy a crazy time heads to New Orleans. New Orleans is a destination that attracts partiers any time of the year, and the French Quarter is the place to be if you're looking for a party.
With a handful of venues, visitors can find a fairly lively vibe in Oslo. The city's high alcohol prices mean that many locals enjoy their drinks at home during pre-parties before heading out on the town. The atmosphere is usually laid-back and chill, with a diversity of entertainment venues that you can choose between.
New Orleans is an amazing city to visit for live music. However, Oslo is not a live music destination.
New Orleans is a world class music destination. The city is known for its music festivals that feature jazz, blues, and many other types of live music. The Jazz Festival is a great time to visit.
Oslo is not a live music destination.
New Orleans is notable for its historic old town. However, Oslo does not have a historic old town.
Many visitors go to New Orleans to see the historical old town. The French Quarter is filled with old architecture and beautiful historic landmarks.
Oslo does not have a historic old town.
Both Oslo and New Orleans are decent shopping destinations.
Oslo is a good destination for shopping. The shopping that is available includes shopping malls and local boutique shops.
If you're looking to go shopping, New Orleans has some nice offerings. New Orleans shopping is mostly centered around shopping malls and chain stores.
Oslo is a world-class destination for its kid-friendly activities. However, New Orleans is lacking in options for its family-friendly activities.
Oslo is an extremely popular city to visit for families. The city goes out of its way to integrate kid-friendly activities into everyday life. From playgrounds and parks to interactive museums and nearby amusement parks, this city is among the most kid-friendly around.
New Orleans doesn't usually come to mind when thinking about kid-friendly destinations. While there are some family-friendly activities in New Orleans like a zoo and several great parks, the city is more known for its parties and nightlife scene. Particularly during certain seasons, most people choose to visit New Orleans without kids.
Oslo and New Orleans are both good to visit as a couple.
Oslo is a nice destination for couples. You can explore castles, go on forest hikes, or enjoy a couple's massage.
New Orleans makes for a fun place to visit for a couple. Couples who enjoy a lively evening, fun festivals, and exploring absolutely amazing restaurants will enjoy a visit to New Orleans. It has a festive and unique atmosphere any time of the year. There are also nice hotels and beautiful parks.
Oslo is a city with good options for backpackers and budget travelers. However, New Orleans is lacking in options for backpackers.
Oslo is a good city to visit for backpackers. Notoriously expensive, this city does have some hostels, but it can be a bit challenging for those on a budget. Because many backpackers avoid the area due to the costs, it can be challenging to meet other backpackers.
New Orleans is a challenging destination for budget travelers and backpackers due to the higher prices. There are a handful of hostels in New Orleans that are good options for backpackers who want to meet other travelers.
Oslo is an excellent place to visit for its student-friendly activities. Also, New Orleans is not quite as popular, but is fairly good for students.
Students come from all over to stay in Oslo. The University of Oslo has an excellent reputation and welcomes many foreign students every year. The school does a lot to make sure international students feel at home here.
New Orleans is popular with students. Students head to New Orleans to enjoy spring break and Mardi Gras.
Oslo is a world-class destination for times when you don't have a car. However, New Orleans is lacking in options for its public transit.
With a huge network, the transit system in Oslo can get you around easily. The system includes buses, trams, undergrounds, local trains, and ferries.
Public transit is generally limited in New Orleans. The city has streetcar lines and bus lines that you can use, but you'll want to have a car if you want to venture outside of these main areas.
Oslo is an excellent place to visit for its walkability. Also, New Orleans is not quite as popular, but is fairly good for its high level of walkability.
Oslo is very walkable. The city has a number of traffic-free areas so it's fun to explore on foot.
New Orleans is a somewhat walkable place. If you stick to the French Quarter and downtown areas, most things are walkable in New Orleans.
For even more information, also check out Is Oslo Worth Visiting? and Is New Orleans Worth Visiting?.
Visitors can find plenty of fun things to do in both Oslo and New Orleans. With generally more activities and things to do, visitors tend to spend more time in Oslo than in New Orleans. Usually, 1-5 days is a good amount of time for Oslo, and 2-3 days is enough time in New Orleans.
Families should spend more time in Oslo than New Orleans. Because of the many family-friendly attractions and fun things to do for kids in Oslo, it's a great place to visit with the whole family.
Couples should spend more time in New Orleans than Oslo. You'll find plenty of romantic sights and fun activities in New Orleans that are perfect for a weekend getaway or a longer couple's trip.
Backpackers and budget travelers should spend more time in Oslo than New Orleans if your budget allows for it. With a larger number of budget-friendly sights, good nightlife, and active things to do, anyone traveling on a budget would have a good time in Oslo.
Oslo is a progressive city where you can fill many days. One day should give you a good understanding of everything this city has to offer. The entire region has so many activities, and you'll want time to do everything.
Visitors enjoy the food and nightlife when visiting the destination of New Orleans. Visiting the old town is also a must. Take your pick from the many activities offered here. With so much to do, one day is probably not enough time to see everything.
Oslo is a green big city where you can fill many days. This city offers something for everyone. Plenty of people spend a weekend in the area when traveling. If you enjoy all that's offered here, then a weekend is just the right amount of time to spend here.
New Orleans is a fun place to experience. If you have a weekend, this is a great place to go. The old town is one of the main draws for visitors. A weekend is often enough time to do most activities. The entire region has so many activities, and you'll want time to do everything.
Oslo is a clean city where you can fill many days. Many people spend five days here.If you enjoy all that's offered here, then five days is just the right amount of time to spend here. The length of your trip often depends on your style of travel.
You'll find live music and food around the vibrant destination of New Orleans. This city offers something for everyone. Exploring the old town is a popular activity. Five days is plenty of time to see everything, even with extra days to spare.
Many people enjoy the nightlife and food when visiting Oslo. Anyone can find something fun to do here. Most people find that one week is more than enough time to see everything.
The vibrant city of New Orleans offers food and nightlife. Make sure you visit the old town while you're here. The length of your trip often depends on your style of travel. One week is usually plenty of time to spend here with extra days to spare. With this much time, visitors often visit nearby destinations or take day trips.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Polar Tours & Cruises in Norway, The Best Northern Lights Tours in Norway, The Best Adventure Tours to United States of America, and The Best Train & Rail Tours in United States of America.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Oslo is $137, while the average daily cost in New Orleans is $239. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Oslo and New Orleans in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Oslo or New Orleans? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some typical examples of transportation costs in Oslo are as follows:
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Oslo:
Some typical examples of transportation costs in New Orleans are as follows:
Also for New Orleans, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Prices for flights to both New Orleans and Oslo change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Oslo.
For New Orleans, here are some samples of tours and activities related to meals and dining experiences:
Some specific costs of activities, tours, and entrance tickets for Oslo are as follows:
Below are a few sample prices from actual travelers for New Orleans's activities, tours, and tickets:
For New Orleans, here are a few prices for actual activities, tours, and tickets provided by various companies:
Some specific costs for nightlife related activities in New Orleans:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Oslo and New Orleans, we can see that New Orleans is more expensive. And not only is Oslo much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. Since Oslo is in Europe and New Orleans is in North America, this is one of the main reasons why the costs are so different, as different regions of the world tend to have overall different travel costs. So, traveling to Oslo would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Oslo and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in New Orleans would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in New Orleans than you might in Oslo.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Oslo Expensive? and Is New Orleans Expensive?.
Oslo has a larger population, and is about 20% larger than the population of New Orleans. When comparing the sizes of Oslo and New Orleans, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Both places have a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. As both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.
Both New Orleans and Oslo during the summer are popular places to visit. The city activities and the family-friendly experiences are the main draw to Oslo this time of year. Also, many travelers come to New Orleans for the city activities, the music scene, and the family-friendly experiences.
Oslo is much colder than New Orleans in the summer. The daily temperature in Oslo averages around 18°C (64°F) in July, and New Orleans fluctuates around 82°F (28°C).
In New Orleans, it's very sunny this time of the year. It's quite sunny in Oslo. In the summer, Oslo often gets around the same amount of sunshine as New Orleans. Oslo gets 246 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while New Orleans receives 264 hours of full sun.
New Orleans gets a good bit of rain this time of year. Oslo usually gets less rain in July than New Orleans. Oslo gets 84 mm (3.3 in) of rain, while New Orleans receives 5.9 inches (149 mm) of rain this time of the year.
The autumn attracts plenty of travelers to both Oslo and New Orleans. Many travelers come to Oslo for the city's sights and attractions and the shopping scene. Also, many visitors come to New Orleans in the autumn for the city's sights and attractions, the shopping scene, and the music scene.
In the autumn, Oslo is much colder than New Orleans. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Oslo in October average around 7°C (45°F), and New Orleans averages at about 69°F (21°C).
People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in New Orleans this time of the year. Oslo usually receives less sunshine than New Orleans during autumn. Oslo gets 86 hours of sunny skies, while New Orleans receives 240 hours of full sun in the autumn.
In October, Oslo usually receives more rain than New Orleans. Oslo gets 84 mm (3.3 in) of rain, while New Orleans receives 3 inches (77 mm) of rain each month for the autumn.
The winter brings many poeple to Oslo as well as New Orleans. Many visitors come to Oslo in the winter for the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine. Also, most visitors come to New Orleans for the shopping scene and the cuisine during these months.
Oslo can get quite cold in the winter. In January, Oslo is generally much colder than New Orleans. Daily temperatures in Oslo average around -4°C (25°F), and New Orleans fluctuates around 51°F (11°C).
In the winter, Oslo often gets less sunshine than New Orleans. Oslo gets 40 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while New Orleans receives 158 hours of full sun.
It's quite rainy in New Orleans. Oslo usually gets less rain in January than New Orleans. Oslo gets 49 mm (1.9 in) of rain, while New Orleans receives 5.2 inches (131 mm) of rain this time of the year.
Both New Orleans and Oslo are popular destinations to visit in the spring with plenty of activities. Most visitors come to Oslo for the activities around the city during these months. Also, the spring months attract visitors to New Orleans because of the activities around the city.
Oslo is much colder than New Orleans in the spring. The daily temperature in Oslo averages around 6°C (42°F) in April, and New Orleans fluctuates around 68°F (20°C).
It's quite sunny in New Orleans. Oslo usually receives less sunshine than New Orleans during spring. Oslo gets 178 hours of sunny skies, while New Orleans receives 254 hours of full sun in the spring.
It rains a lot this time of the year in New Orleans. In April, Oslo usually receives less rain than New Orleans. Oslo gets 42 mm (1.7 in) of rain, while New Orleans receives 4.5 inches (114 mm) of rain each month for the spring.
Oslo | New Orleans | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | -4°C (25°F) | 49 mm (1.9 in) | 51°F (11°C) | 5.2 inches (131 mm) |
Feb | -3°C (26°F) | 36 mm (1.4 in) | 54°F (12°C) | 5.8 inches (147 mm) |
Mar | 1°C (33°F) | 46 mm (1.8 in) | 62°F (16°C) | 5 inches (126 mm) |
Apr | 6°C (42°F) | 42 mm (1.7 in) | 68°F (20°C) | 4.5 inches (114 mm) |
May | 12°C (53°F) | 52 mm (2 in) | 75°F (24°C) | 4.3 inches (110 mm) |
Jun | 16°C (61°F) | 65 mm (2.6 in) | 80°F (27°C) | 5.9 inches (151 mm) |
Jul | 18°C (64°F) | 84 mm (3.3 in) | 82°F (28°C) | 5.9 inches (149 mm) |
Aug | 16°C (61°F) | 90 mm (3.5 in) | 82°F (28°C) | 6.2 inches (157 mm) |
Sep | 12°C (53°F) | 90 mm (3.5 in) | 78°F (26°C) | 5.5 inches (140 mm) |
Oct | 7°C (45°F) | 84 mm (3.3 in) | 69°F (21°C) | 3 inches (77 mm) |
Nov | 1°C (35°F) | 75 mm (3 in) | 61°F (16°C) | 4.8 inches (122 mm) |
Dec | -2°C (28°F) | 56 mm (2.2 in) | 55°F (13°C) | 5.7 inches (146 mm) |