Which place is cheaper, Snowdonia National Park or Pamukkale?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
Which city is more affordable and which is best for your travel style? If you're trying to figure out where to go next, comparing the travel costs between Pamukkale and Snowdonia National Park can help you decide which place is right for you.
Pamukkale is in southeastern Aegean Turkey and is historically a spa town that has been in existence since the 2nd century BC. It is popular with tourists for its beautiful hot springs and travertines, or pools that are coated in a very unique calcium covering. The area is very rich in mineral content and the water, which has been flowing for thousands of years, has deposited calcium in each pool. This unique whiteness creates an unworldly beauty that draws visitors from around the world. If you're visiting during the summer months when the sun is out in full force, don't forget the sunscreen, as the white reflects the light and you can end up with a sunburn quite quickly. You'll also want to make sure you have sunglasses available because the glare can be quite extreme.
Snowdonia National Park is in North West Wales and is known for its outstanding natural beauty. Mount Snowdon is located in the park, which is the highest peak in all of Wales. There are many campsites and hiking trails, as well as traditional Welsh pubs and shops. English is one of the languages spoken in Snowdonia, however 75% of the population, which is 121,000, speaks Welsh.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Tours for Seniors to Turkey, The Best G Adventures Tours to Turkey, The Best Romantic Tours for Couples in United Kingdom, and The Best Luxury Tours to United Kingdom.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Pamukkale is $156, while the average daily cost in Snowdonia National Park is $93. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Pamukkale and Snowdonia National Park in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Pamukkale or Snowdonia National Park? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Also for Pamukkale, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Snowdonia National Park:
Prices for flights to both Snowdonia National Park and Pamukkale change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
For Pamukkale, here are some examples of average entertainment and activity prices from previous travelers:
Also, here are some specific examples of entertainment, tickets, and activities for Pamukkale.
Some specific costs of activities, tours, and entrance tickets for Snowdonia National Park are as follows:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Pamukkale and Snowdonia National Park, we can see that Pamukkale is more expensive. And not only is Snowdonia National Park much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Snowdonia National Park would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Snowdonia National Park and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Pamukkale would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Pamukkale than you might in Snowdonia National Park.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Pamukkale Expensive? and Is Snowdonia National Park Expensive?.
Both places have a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. As both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.
Both Snowdonia National Park and Pamukkale during the summer are popular places to visit. Also, the beaches, the hiking, and the family-friendly experiences are the main draw to Snowdonia National Park this time of year.
In July, Pamukkale is generally much warmer than Snowdonia National Park. Daily temperatures in Pamukkale average around 28°C (82°F), and Snowdonia National Park fluctuates around 15°C (60°F).
In Snowdonia National Park, it's very sunny this time of the year. It's quite sunny in Pamukkale. In the summer, Pamukkale often gets more sunshine than Snowdonia National Park. Pamukkale gets 356 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Snowdonia National Park receives 202 hours of full sun.
Pamukkale usually gets less rain in July than Snowdonia National Park. Pamukkale gets 3 mm (0.1 in) of rain, while Snowdonia National Park receives 53 mm (2.1 in) of rain this time of the year.
The autumn attracts plenty of travelers to both Pamukkale and Snowdonia National Park. Also, many travelers come to Snowdonia National Park for the hiking trails and the natural beauty of the area.
Pamukkale is much warmer than Snowdonia National Park in the autumn. The daily temperature in Pamukkale averages around 19°C (67°F) in October, and Snowdonia National Park fluctuates around 12°C (53°F).
In Pamukkale, it's very sunny this time of the year. Pamukkale usually receives more sunshine than Snowdonia National Park during autumn. Pamukkale gets 232 hours of sunny skies, while Snowdonia National Park receives 101 hours of full sun in the autumn.
In October, Pamukkale usually receives less rain than Snowdonia National Park. Pamukkale gets 39 mm (1.5 in) of rain, while Snowdonia National Park receives 91 mm (3.6 in) of rain each month for the autumn.
The winter brings many poeple to Pamukkale as well as Snowdonia National Park. Also, many visitors come to Snowdonia National Park in the winter for the skiing and the cuisine.
In the winter, Pamukkale is much warmer than Snowdonia National Park. Typically, the winter temperatures in Pamukkale in January average around 9°C (48°F), and Snowdonia National Park averages at about 5°C (42°F).
In the winter, Pamukkale often gets more sunshine than Snowdonia National Park. Pamukkale gets 137 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Snowdonia National Park receives 63 hours of full sun.
Pamukkale receives a lot of rain in the winter. Pamukkale usually gets more rain in January than Snowdonia National Park. Pamukkale gets 111 mm (4.4 in) of rain, while Snowdonia National Park receives 83 mm (3.3 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Snowdonia National Park and Pamukkale are popular destinations to visit in the spring with plenty of activities. Also, most visitors come to Snowdonia National Park for the beaches and the natural beauty during these months.
In April, Pamukkale is generally much warmer than Snowdonia National Park. Daily temperatures in Pamukkale average around 17°C (62°F), and Snowdonia National Park fluctuates around 8°C (47°F).
The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Pamukkale. Pamukkale usually receives more sunshine than Snowdonia National Park during spring. Pamukkale gets 226 hours of sunny skies, while Snowdonia National Park receives 179 hours of full sun in the spring.
In April, Pamukkale usually receives around the same amount of rain as Snowdonia National Park. Pamukkale gets 52 mm (2 in) of rain, while Snowdonia National Park receives 53 mm (2.1 in) of rain each month for the spring.
Pamukkale | Snowdonia National Park | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 9°C (48°F) | 111 mm (4.4 in) | 5°C (42°F) | 83 mm (3.3 in) |
Feb | 10°C (50°F) | 96 mm (3.8 in) | 5°C (41°F) | 56 mm (2.2 in) |
Mar | 13°C (55°F) | 70 mm (2.8 in) | 6°C (44°F) | 65 mm (2.6 in) |
Apr | 17°C (62°F) | 52 mm (2 in) | 8°C (47°F) | 53 mm (2.1 in) |
May | 21°C (70°F) | 27 mm (1.1 in) | 11°C (52°F) | 49 mm (1.9 in) |
Jun | 26°C (78°F) | 17 mm (0.7 in) | 14°C (56°F) | 52 mm (2 in) |
Jul | 28°C (82°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 15°C (60°F) | 53 mm (2.1 in) |
Aug | 27°C (81°F) | 2 mm (0.1 in) | 15°C (60°F) | 74 mm (2.9 in) |
Sep | 24°C (76°F) | 12 mm (0.5 in) | 14°C (57°F) | 73 mm (2.9 in) |
Oct | 19°C (67°F) | 39 mm (1.5 in) | 12°C (53°F) | 91 mm (3.6 in) |
Nov | 14°C (58°F) | 71 mm (2.8 in) | 8°C (47°F) | 101 mm (4 in) |
Dec | 10°C (51°F) | 129 mm (5.1 in) | 6°C (44°F) | 94 mm (3.7 in) |