Which place is cheaper, Zermatt or Pamukkale?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
Which city is more affordable and which is best for your travel style? If you're trying to figure out where to go next, comparing the travel costs between Pamukkale and Zermatt can help you decide which place is right for you.
Pamukkale is in southeastern Aegean Turkey and is historically a spa town that has been in existence since the 2nd century BC. It is popular with tourists for its beautiful hot springs and travertines, or pools that are coated in a very unique calcium covering. The area is very rich in mineral content and the water, which has been flowing for thousands of years, has deposited calcium in each pool. This unique whiteness creates an unworldly beauty that draws visitors from around the world. If you're visiting during the summer months when the sun is out in full force, don't forget the sunscreen, as the white reflects the light and you can end up with a sunburn quite quickly. You'll also want to make sure you have sunglasses available because the glare can be quite extreme.
Located at the foot of the Matterhorn, Zermatt is a Swiss village best known for its skiing, climbing, and hiking opportunities. It has become a popular mountain resort town due to its location and also features a number of boutique shops, hotels, and restaurants that cater to the vacationers who come to enjoy the many winter activities of the Alps.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best Tours for Seniors to Turkey, The Best G Adventures Tours to Turkey, The Best Sightseeing Tours in Switzerland, and The Best Romantic Tours for Couples in Switzerland.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Pamukkale is $156, while the average daily cost in Zermatt is $223. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Pamukkale and Zermatt in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Pamukkale or Zermatt? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Also for Pamukkale, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Zermatt:
Prices for flights to both Zermatt and Pamukkale change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Zermatt.
For Pamukkale, here are some examples of average entertainment and activity prices from previous travelers:
Also, here are some specific examples of entertainment, tickets, and activities for Pamukkale.
Some specific costs of activities, tours, and entrance tickets for Zermatt are as follows:
Some specific costs for nightlife related activities in Zermatt:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Pamukkale and Zermatt, we can see that Zermatt is more expensive. And not only is Pamukkale much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Pamukkale would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Pamukkale and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Zermatt would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Zermatt than you might in Pamukkale.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Pamukkale Expensive? and Is Zermatt Expensive?.
Pamukkale has a larger population, and is about 51% larger than the population of Zermatt. When comparing the sizes of Pamukkale and Zermatt, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Both places have a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. As both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.
Both Zermatt and Pamukkale during the summer are popular places to visit. Also, the hiking, the small town charm, and the family-friendly experiences are the main draw to Zermatt this time of year.
In the summer, Pamukkale is a little warmer than Zermatt. Typically, the summer temperatures in Pamukkale in July average around 28°C (82°F), and Zermatt averages at about 23°C (73°F).
In Zermatt, it's very sunny this time of the year. It's quite sunny in Pamukkale. In the summer, Pamukkale often gets more sunshine than Zermatt. Pamukkale gets 356 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Zermatt receives 250 hours of full sun.
Zermatt gets a good bit of rain this time of year. Pamukkale usually gets less rain in July than Zermatt. Pamukkale gets 3 mm (0.1 in) of rain, while Zermatt receives 133 mm (5.2 in) of rain this time of the year.
The autumn attracts plenty of travelers to both Pamukkale and Zermatt. Also, many travelers come to Zermatt for the hiking trails, the shopping scene, the small town atmosphere, and the natural beauty of the area.
In October, Pamukkale is generally a little warmer than Zermatt. Daily temperatures in Pamukkale average around 19°C (67°F), and Zermatt fluctuates around 15°C (58°F).
In Pamukkale, it's very sunny this time of the year. Pamukkale usually receives more sunshine than Zermatt during autumn. Pamukkale gets 232 hours of sunny skies, while Zermatt receives 152 hours of full sun in the autumn.
Zermatt receives a lot of rain in the autumn. In October, Pamukkale usually receives less rain than Zermatt. Pamukkale gets 39 mm (1.5 in) of rain, while Zermatt receives 140 mm (5.5 in) of rain each month for the autumn.
The winter brings many poeple to Pamukkale as well as Zermatt. Also, many visitors come to Zermatt in the winter for the skiing, the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine.
Zermatt can get quite cold in the winter. Pamukkale is much warmer than Zermatt in the winter. The daily temperature in Pamukkale averages around 9°C (48°F) in January, and Zermatt fluctuates around 5°C (41°F).
In the winter, Pamukkale often gets more sunshine than Zermatt. Pamukkale gets 137 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Zermatt receives 119 hours of full sun.
Pamukkale receives a lot of rain in the winter. Pamukkale usually gets more rain in January than Zermatt. Pamukkale gets 111 mm (4.4 in) of rain, while Zermatt receives 76 mm (3 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Zermatt and Pamukkale are popular destinations to visit in the spring with plenty of activities. Also, most visitors come to Zermatt for the small town charm and the natural beauty during these months.
In the spring, Pamukkale is a little warmer than Zermatt. Typically, the spring temperatures in Pamukkale in April average around 17°C (62°F), and Zermatt averages at about 13°C (55°F).
The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Pamukkale. Pamukkale usually receives more sunshine than Zermatt during spring. Pamukkale gets 226 hours of sunny skies, while Zermatt receives 176 hours of full sun in the spring.
It rains a lot this time of the year in Zermatt. In April, Pamukkale usually receives less rain than Zermatt. Pamukkale gets 52 mm (2 in) of rain, while Zermatt receives 152 mm (6 in) of rain each month for the spring.
Pamukkale | Zermatt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | 9°C (48°F) | 111 mm (4.4 in) | 5°C (41°F) | 76 mm (3 in) |
Feb | 10°C (50°F) | 96 mm (3.8 in) | 6°C (44°F) | 71 mm (2.8 in) |
Mar | 13°C (55°F) | 70 mm (2.8 in) | 10°C (49°F) | 106 mm (4.2 in) |
Apr | 17°C (62°F) | 52 mm (2 in) | 13°C (55°F) | 152 mm (6 in) |
May | 21°C (70°F) | 27 mm (1.1 in) | 17°C (62°F) | 194 mm (7.6 in) |
Jun | 26°C (78°F) | 17 mm (0.7 in) | 20°C (69°F) | 171 mm (6.7 in) |
Jul | 28°C (82°F) | 3 mm (0.1 in) | 23°C (73°F) | 133 mm (5.2 in) |
Aug | 27°C (81°F) | 2 mm (0.1 in) | 22°C (72°F) | 166 mm (6.5 in) |
Sep | 24°C (76°F) | 12 mm (0.5 in) | 19°C (67°F) | 153 mm (6 in) |
Oct | 19°C (67°F) | 39 mm (1.5 in) | 15°C (58°F) | 140 mm (5.5 in) |
Nov | 14°C (58°F) | 71 mm (2.8 in) | 9°C (49°F) | 120 mm (4.7 in) |
Dec | 10°C (51°F) | 129 mm (5.1 in) | 6°C (42°F) | 63 mm (2.5 in) |