Which place is cheaper, Como or Krakow?
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
Should I visit Krakow or Como? This is a common question asked by many travelers. By figuring out which city has activities that align with your interests along with knowing which is more affordable, you'll understand where you can get more bang for your buck. So, let's dive into the details and the data, which all comes from actual travelers.
Krakow is Poland's second largest city. It sits on both sides of the Wisla River at the foot of the Carpathian Mountains. There are more than 1.4 million residents in the metropolitan area. Krakow is known as a historical and beautiful city that is one of the country's most popular tourist destinations. Tourism makes up a large part of the city's economy, but there is also a university and several local colleges which are major employers as well. Technology has grown in recent years and the city has some notable employees including Google, IBM and Motorola. Other important industries include steel, pharmaceuticals and tobacco.
At the foot of the jagged cliffs of the Alps lies an expanse of shimmering waters made a golden white by the sun and pockmarked by sailors. Its blue waters beckon you to come forth and dive deep into the mystic body of Lago di Como, or Lake Como. With an area of 146 square kilometers, Lake Como is the third largest lake in Italy, right after Lake Garda and Lake Maggiore. The lake was originally named by the Romans after the city of Comum, now presently called Como. Lake Como is shaped into an inverted "Y," with towns like Como, Lecco, Bellagio, Menaggio and Lierna situated around it.
For some great organized tour ideas, see The Best 10-Day Tours in Poland, The Best Sightseeing Tours in Poland, The Best One-Week (7-Day) Tours from Rome, and The Best 10-Day Tours from Rome.
These are the overall average travel costs for the two destinations.
The average daily cost (per person) in Krakow is $64, while the average daily cost in Como is $229. These costs include accommodation (assuming double occupancy, so the traveler is sharing the room), food, transportation, and entertainment. While every person is different, these costs are an average of past travelers in each destination. What follows is a categorical breakdown of travel costs for Krakow and Como in more detail.
Looking for a hotel in Krakow or Como? Prices vary by location, date, season, and the level of luxury. See below for options and compare which is best for your budget and travel style.
Kayak helps you find the best prices for hotels, flights, and rental cars for destinations around the world. Compare prices for multiple destinations when planning your next trip.
Some specific examples of transportation prices in Krakow:
Also for Como, here are a few examples of actual transportation services:
Prices for flights to both Como and Krakow change regularly based on dates and travel demand. We suggest you find the best prices for your next trip on Kayak, because you can compare the cost of flights across multiple airlines for your prefered dates.
Also, here are some specific examples of food and dining related activities in Krakow.
For Como, here are some samples of tours and activities related to meals and dining experiences:
Here are a few actual costs in Krakow for available activities, ticket prices, and tours:
For Como, here are a few prices for actual activities, tours, and tickets provided by various companies:
Below are a few samples from actual travelers for alcohol and nightlife costs in Krakow:
Here are a few nightlife and alcohol tours and activities from local tour providers in Krakow:
Here are a few nightlife and alcohol tours and activities from local tour providers in Como:
When we compare the travel costs of actual travelers between Krakow and Como, we can see that Como is more expensive. And not only is Krakow much less expensive, but it is actually a significantly cheaper destination. So, traveling to Krakow would let you spend less money overall. Or, you could decide to spend more money in Krakow and be able to afford a more luxurious travel style by staying in nicer hotels, eating at more expensive restaurants, taking tours, and experiencing more activities. The same level of travel in Como would naturally cost you much more money, so you would probably want to keep your budget a little tighter in Como than you might in Krakow.
If you're trying to decide if either of these two destinations are within your price range, also see Is Krakow Expensive? and Is Como Expensive?.
Krakow has a larger population, and is about 10 times larger than the population of Como. When comparing the sizes of Krakow and Como, keep in mind that a larger population does not always imply the destination has more attractions or better activities. So, always research the type of place that you want to visit along with the activities and attractions that interest you.
Both places have a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. As both cities are in the northern hemisphere, summer is in July and winter is in January.
The summer brings many poeple to Krakow as well as Como. Also, many visitors come to Como in the summer for the beaches, the hiking, and the family-friendly experiences.
Krakow is cooler than Como in the summer. The daily temperature in Krakow averages around 19°C (67°F) in July, and Como fluctuates around 23°C (73°F).
The sun comes out a lot this time of the year in Como. People are often attracted to the plentiful sunshine in Krakow this time of the year. In the summer, Krakow often gets less sunshine than Como. Krakow gets 201 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Como receives 250 hours of full sun.
Krakow usually gets more rain in July than Como. Krakow gets 86 mm (3.4 in) of rain, while Como receives 60 mm (2.4 in) of rain this time of the year.
Both Como and Krakow are popular destinations to visit in the autumn with plenty of activities. Also, most visitors come to Como for the hiking trails, the shopping scene, and the natural beauty of the area during these months.
In the autumn, Krakow is cooler than Como. Typically, the autumn temperatures in Krakow in October average around 11°C (51°F), and Como averages at about 15°C (58°F).
Krakow usually receives less sunshine than Como during autumn. Krakow gets 97 hours of sunny skies, while Como receives 152 hours of full sun in the autumn.
It rains a lot this time of the year in Como. In October, Krakow usually receives less rain than Como. Krakow gets 45 mm (1.8 in) of rain, while Como receives 103 mm (4 in) of rain each month for the autumn.
Both Como and Krakow during the winter are popular places to visit. Furthermore, the winter months attract visitors to Como because of the museums, the shopping scene, and the cuisine.
The weather in Como can be very cold. Krakow can be very cold during winter. In January, Krakow is generally much colder than Como. Daily temperatures in Krakow average around -2°C (29°F), and Como fluctuates around 5°C (41°F).
In the winter, Krakow often gets less sunshine than Como. Krakow gets 38 hours of sunny skies this time of year, while Como receives 119 hours of full sun.
Krakow usually gets less rain in January than Como. Krakow gets 34 mm (1.3 in) of rain, while Como receives 68 mm (2.7 in) of rain this time of the year.
The spring attracts plenty of travelers to both Krakow and Como. Furthermore, the beaches and the natural beauty are the main draw to Como this time of year.
Krakow is cooler than Como in the spring. The daily temperature in Krakow averages around 10°C (50°F) in April, and Como fluctuates around 13°C (55°F).
Krakow usually receives less sunshine than Como during spring. Krakow gets 132 hours of sunny skies, while Como receives 176 hours of full sun in the spring.
In April, Krakow usually receives less rain than Como. Krakow gets 49 mm (1.9 in) of rain, while Como receives 76 mm (3 in) of rain each month for the spring.
Krakow | Como | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | Temp (°C) | Rain (mm) | |
Jan | -2°C (29°F) | 34 mm (1.3 in) | 5°C (41°F) | 68 mm (2.7 in) |
Feb | 0°C (32°F) | 32 mm (1.3 in) | 6°C (44°F) | 60 mm (2.3 in) |
Mar | 5°C (40°F) | 34 mm (1.3 in) | 10°C (49°F) | 85 mm (3.4 in) |
Apr | 10°C (50°F) | 49 mm (1.9 in) | 13°C (55°F) | 76 mm (3 in) |
May | 15°C (59°F) | 83 mm (3.3 in) | 17°C (62°F) | 102 mm (4 in) |
Jun | 18°C (64°F) | 96 mm (3.8 in) | 20°C (69°F) | 78 mm (3.1 in) |
Jul | 19°C (67°F) | 86 mm (3.4 in) | 23°C (73°F) | 60 mm (2.4 in) |
Aug | 19°C (66°F) | 85 mm (3.3 in) | 22°C (72°F) | 94 mm (3.7 in) |
Sep | 15°C (60°F) | 52 mm (2 in) | 19°C (67°F) | 74 mm (2.9 in) |
Oct | 11°C (51°F) | 45 mm (1.8 in) | 15°C (58°F) | 103 mm (4 in) |
Nov | 5°C (41°F) | 45 mm (1.8 in) | 9°C (49°F) | 102 mm (4 in) |
Dec | 1°C (33°F) | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 6°C (42°F) | 60 mm (2.4 in) |